Erie, PA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Great Lakes Institute of Technology

Great Lakes Institute of Technology reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
335
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Great Lakes Institute of Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 213181 · Great Lakes Institute of 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Lincoln Technical Institute-South Plainfield · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 335
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Lincoln Technical Institute-South Plainfield (+0.00/1k)

Great Lakes Institute of Technology sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Lincoln Technical Institute-South Plainfield. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Lincoln Technical Institute-South Plainfield (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Great Lakes Institute of Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Great Lakes Institute

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Great on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Great Lakes Institute of Technology's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Great Lakes Institute of Technology was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 PA 2-year peers in this comparison, Great Lakes Institute of Technology is larger than 75% and safer-reporting than 17% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Great Lakes Institute of T…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Great Lakes Institute of T…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Studio Incamminati390.00017
West Virginia Junior College-United Career Institute610.00317
Pennsylvania Gunsmith School640.00617
DLP Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center9033.3388
Lansdale School of Business930.001117
UPMC St. Margaret School of Nursing970.001417
Valley Forge Military College9792.78146
Joseph F McCloskey School of Nursing100140.00193
Miller-Motte College-Berks Technical Institute-Lewisburg1260.002217
Commonwealth Technical Institute1460.002517
Citizens School of Nursing1520.002817
Great Lakes Institute of Technology (this campus)3350.007517

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Great Lakes Institute of Technology has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Lincoln Technical Institute-South Plainfield.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

18 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
18 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Great Lakes Institute of Technology vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

PA

Great Lakes Institute of Technology

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
335
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Great Lakes Institute of Technology sits on price and outcomes

See Pennsylvania's cost ranking

At $17,540, Great Lakes Institute of Technology's reported average net price is cheaper than 31% among 261 Pennsylvania colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $19,954.

$17,540
average net price
$19,954
Pennsylvania median
2.3×
six-year earnings to median debt
$6,709
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $15,475 for families reporting under $30,000 against $22,184 above $110,000, a difference of $6,709. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $17,540 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

Median earnings six years after entry ($26,092) are less than 1.5 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 60% complete within six years, so roughly 40% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$26,092
Median Earnings (10yr)
$28,704
Loan Repayment (3yr)
48%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,198 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Great Lakes Institute of Technology safe?
Great Lakes Institute of Technology has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 335 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Lincoln Technical Institute-South Plainfield. Same-state same-level set: UPMC Jameson School of Nursing (0.00/1k); Lincoln Technical Institute-Philadelphia (0.00/1k); Williamson College of the Trades (3.11/1k); UPMC Mercy School of Nursing (172.08/1k); Automotive Training Center-Exton (0.00/1k); Automotive Training Center-Warminster (0.00/1k); Fortis Institute-Scranton (0.00/1k); Pittsburgh Institute of Mortuary Science Inc (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Great Lakes Institute of Technology?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Great Lakes Institute of Technology reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Great Lakes Institute of Technology compare to similar schools?
Great Lakes Institute of Technology reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Lincoln Technical Institute-South Plainfield. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Lincoln Technical Institute-South Plainfield (0.00/1k); Arizona College of Nursing-Tampa (0.00/1k); American Beauty College (8.98/1k); University of Puerto Rico-Utuado (5.99/1k); Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: UPMC Jameson School of Nursing (0.00/1k); Lincoln Technical Institute-Philadelphia (0.00/1k); Williamson College of the Trades (3.11/1k); UPMC Mercy School of Nursing (172.08/1k); Automotive Training Center-Exton (0.00/1k); Automotive Training Center-Warminster (0.00/1k); Fortis Institute-Scranton (0.00/1k); Pittsburgh Institute of Mortuary Science Inc (0.00/1k).
Does Great Lakes Institute of Technology have fire safety data?
Great Lakes Institute of Technology has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.