Scranton, PA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Fortis Institute-Scranton

Fortis Institute-Scranton reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
372
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Fortis Institute-Scranton reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 385503 · Fortis Institute-Scranton 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Luther Seminary · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 372
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Luther Seminary (+0.00/1k)

Fortis Institute-Scranton sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Luther Seminary. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Luther Seminary (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Fortis Institute-Scranton reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Fortis Institute-Scranton

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Fortis on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Fortis Institute-Scranton's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Fortis Institute-Scranton was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 PA 2-year peers in this comparison, Fortis Institute-Scranton is larger than 75% and safer-reporting than 22% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Fortis Institute-Scranton: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Fortis Institute-Scranton: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
DLP Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center9033.3308
Lansdale School of Business930.00322
UPMC St. Margaret School of Nursing970.00622
Valley Forge Military College9792.7866
Joseph F McCloskey School of Nursing100140.00113
Miller-Motte College-Berks Technical Institute-Lewisburg1260.001422
Commonwealth Technical Institute1460.001722
Citizens School of Nursing1520.001922
Laurel Technical Institute1630.002222
Western Pennsylvania Hospital School of Nursing1640.002522
Central Pennsylvania Institute of Science and Technology1710.002822
Fortis Institute-Scranton (this campus)3720.007522

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Fortis Institute-Scranton has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Hesston College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

18 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
18 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Fortis Institute-Scranton vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

PA

Fortis Institute-Scranton

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
372
Data year
2024

KS

Hesston College

21.45 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
373
Data year
2024

MN

Luther Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
371
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Fortis Institute-Scranton sits on price and outcomes

See Pennsylvania's cost ranking

At $20,186, Fortis Institute-Scranton's reported average net price is cheaper than 52% among 261 Pennsylvania colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $19,954.

$20,186
average net price
$19,954
Pennsylvania median
3.3×
six-year earnings to median debt
$7,593
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $19,792 for families reporting under $30,000 against $27,385 above $110,000, a difference of $7,593. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $20,186 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

Six-year median earnings of $31,301 run about 1.6 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. Only 46% complete within six years. Most students here do not finish, which is the single most important number on this page for anyone weighing the cost.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$15,348
Out-of-State Tuition
$15,348
Avg Net Price
$20,186
Median Debt
$9,500
Pell Grant Recipients
71%
How does this cost rank in PA? →

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$31,301
Median Earnings (10yr)
$30,224
Loan Repayment (3yr)
37%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,166 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fortis Institute-Scranton safe?
Fortis Institute-Scranton has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 372 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Hesston College. Same-state same-level set: Pittsburgh Institute of Mortuary Science Inc (0.00/1k); Automotive Training Center-Exton (0.00/1k); Aviation Institute of Maintenance-Philadelphia (0.00/1k); Lincoln Technical Institute-Philadelphia (0.00/1k); Great Lakes Institute of Technology (0.00/1k); UPMC Jameson School of Nursing (0.00/1k); Williamson College of the Trades (3.11/1k); UPMC Mercy School of Nursing (172.08/1k).
What crimes are reported at Fortis Institute-Scranton?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Fortis Institute-Scranton reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Fortis Institute-Scranton compare to similar schools?
Fortis Institute-Scranton reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Hesston College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Hesston College (21.45/1k); Luther Seminary (0.00/1k); ICPR Junior College-Mayaguez (0.00/1k); Mid-Del Technology Center (0.00/1k); Fortis Institute-Lawrenceville (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Pittsburgh Institute of Mortuary Science Inc (0.00/1k); Automotive Training Center-Exton (0.00/1k); Aviation Institute of Maintenance-Philadelphia (0.00/1k); Lincoln Technical Institute-Philadelphia (0.00/1k); Great Lakes Institute of Technology (0.00/1k); UPMC Jameson School of Nursing (0.00/1k); Williamson College of the Trades (3.11/1k); UPMC Mercy School of Nursing (172.08/1k).
Does Fortis Institute-Scranton have fire safety data?
Fortis Institute-Scranton has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.