Fayetteville, NC · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville

Across 2022–2024, Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville reported 1 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count fell over that span (largest filed category: Robbery). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: Aviation Institute of Maintenance-Charlotte.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
336
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 458405 · Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-DOWN ↓ 100%
  • CAT-LEAD Robbery
  • ENR-SMALL 336
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora (+0.00/1k)

Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Miller-Motte on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NC 2-year peers in this comparison, Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville is larger than 8% and safer-reporting than 17% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Miller-Motte College-Fayet…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Miller-Motte College-Fayet…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Miller-Motte College-Jacksonville1950.00017
Southeastern College-Charlotte2520.00317
Pamlico Community College2630.00617
Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville (this campus)3360.00817
Aviation Institute of Maintenance-Charlotte3440.001117
Louisburg College4020.001417
Miller-Motte College-Raleigh4090.001717
Roanoke-Chowan Community College6681.50193
Mayland Community College8500.002217
Martin Community College8910.002517
Piedmont Community College8960.002817
Tri-County Community College1,0230.003117

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What actually gets reported at Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Robbery.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Burglary and Fondling. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville: Criminal Offenses by year

Declining 100% (1 → 0 incidents)

00.511.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 1On-campus incidents, 2023: 0On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 1 0 ▼ -100.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Robbery 001
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Burglary 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Motor Vehicle Theft 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NC

Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
336
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville sits on price and outcomes

See North Carolina's cost ranking

At $26,409, Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville's reported average net price is cheaper than 88% among 145 North Carolina colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $14,086.

$26,409
average net price
$14,086
North Carolina median
1.7×
six-year earnings to median debt
$2,373
reported income-bracket spread

This institution reports an unusual pattern: families under $30,000 record a HIGHER net price ($26,330) than those above $110,000 ($23,957). Fewer than 2% of institutions reporting both brackets show this shape. It can reflect small bracket samples or programme mix rather than aid policy, so treat it as a question to raise with the financial-aid office rather than a finding.

Median earnings six years after entry ($26,349) are less than one year of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 68% complete within six years, so roughly 32% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$26,349
Median Earnings (10yr)
$31,102
Loan Repayment (3yr)
40%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,200 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville safe?
Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 336 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora. Same-state same-level set: Aviation Institute of Maintenance-Charlotte (0.00/1k); Louisburg College (0.00/1k); Pamlico Community College (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Raleigh (0.00/1k); Southeastern College-Charlotte (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Jacksonville (0.00/1k); Roanoke-Chowan Community College (1.50/1k); Mayland Community College (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in NC; same-state same-level scored peers include Aviation Institute of Maintenance-Charlotte (0.00/1k); Louisburg College (0.00/1k); Pamlico Community College (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Raleigh (0.00/1k); Southeastern College-Charlotte (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Jacksonville (0.00/1k); Roanoke-Chowan Community College (1.50/1k); Mayland Community College (0.00/1k).
Does Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville have fire safety data?
Miller-Motte College-Fayetteville has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.