TX
South Texas Training Center
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Pharr, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit
South Texas Training Center
Across 2022–2024, South Texas Training Center reported 2 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, with no net change between the first and last filed year; largest filed category is Burglary.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- 120
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
South Texas Training Center reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 455974 · South Texas Training Center 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UNK State rank n/a
- PEER-FINISH Aaniiih Nakoda College · ±0.00
- ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-LEAD Burglary
- ENR-SMALL 120
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Aaniiih Nakoda College (+0.00/1k)
South Texas Training Center sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Aaniiih Nakoda College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Aaniiih Nakoda College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
South Texas Training Center reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around South Texas Training
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest South on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- South Texas Training Center · this campus · lowest 0
South Texas Training Center — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- New York School of · highest peer 0
New York School of Esthetics & Day Spa — highest peer
0 per 1,000 students
- Aaniiih Nakoda College · near 0
Aaniiih Nakoda College — near
0 per 1,000 students
- P B Cosmetology Education · near 0
P B Cosmetology Education Center — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Mercer County Technical Education · near 0
Mercer County Technical Education Center — near
0 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around South Texas Training Center's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
South Texas Training Center decreased from 2 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 37 TX Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, South Texas Training Center is larger than 67% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- South Texas Training Center: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Edge Institute | 73 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 |
| Victoria Beauty & Barber College | 73 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 |
| Academy of Hair Design-Lufkin | 74 | 0.00 | 6 | 3 |
| Southeast Texas Career Institute | 75 | 0.00 | 8 | 3 |
| Natural Images Beauty College | 75 | 0.00 | 8 | 3 |
| Nuvani Institute | 77 | 0.00 | 14 | 3 |
| Baldwin Beauty School-North Austin | 78 | 0.00 | 17 | 3 |
| Jay's Technical Institute | 79 | 0.00 | 19 | 3 |
| The Salon Professional Academy-Georgetown | 79 | 0.00 | 19 | 3 |
| Valley Grande Institute for Academic Studies | 84 | 0.00 | 25 | 3 |
| Top of the Line Barber School | 86 | 0.00 | 28 | 3 |
| South Texas Training Center (this campus) | 120 | 0.00 | 67 | 3 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
What changed between 2023 and 2024
Reported on-campus incidents at South Texas Training Center fell from 2 to 0 (-100%). The decrease shows up in Burglary (2 to 0).
This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.
What actually gets reported at South Texas Training Center
Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Burglary.
The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Fondling and Incest. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.
Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.
Crime Statistics by Year
11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus onlySouth Texas Training Center: Criminal Offenses by year
Stable
Read the chart as text
| Period | On-campus incidents |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| Crime Type | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burglary | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Aggravated Assault | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arson | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fondling | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Incest | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Negligent Manslaughter | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rape | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robbery | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Statutory Rape | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
9 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
South Texas Training Center vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
MT
Aaniiih Nakoda College
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
NJ
P B Cosmetology Education Center
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Cost context
Where South Texas Training Center sits on price and outcomes
At $8,314, South Texas Training Center's reported average net price is cheaper than 18% among 337 Texas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,267.
- $8,314
- average net price
- $18,267
- Texas median
- 5.4×
- six-year earnings to median debt
- $7,519
- reported income-bracket spread
Aid here is steeply income-scaled. Families reporting under $30,000 of income record a net price of $7,451, while those above $110,000 record $14,970 - roughly 2.0 times as much. A published average of $8,314 therefore describes very few families well; the bracket nearest your own income is the more useful figure.
Six-year median earnings of $19,766 run about 2.4 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. 92% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.
Academic & Financial Profile
Tuition & Costs
- In-State Tuition
- $13,566
- Out-of-State Tuition
- $13,566
- Avg Net Price
- $8,314
- Median Debt
- $3,677
- Pell Grant Recipients
- 90%
Outcomes
- Median Earnings (6yr)
- $19,766
- Median Earnings (10yr)
- $29,384
- Loan Repayment (3yr)
- 44%
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,322 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Aaniiih Nakoda College
Harlem, MT · 120 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
P B Cosmetology Education Center
Gloucester, NJ · 120 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Mercer County Technical Education Center
Princeton, WV · 120 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Beyond 21st Century Beauty Academy
Santa Fe Springs, CA · 120 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
New York School of Esthetics & Day Spa
White Plains, NY · 120 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Frequently Asked Questions
Is South Texas Training Center safe?
South Texas Training Center has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 120 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Aaniiih Nakoda College. Same-state same-level set: Ann Webb Skin Institute (0.00/1k); Central Texas Beauty College-Round Rock (0.00/1k); Tri-State Cosmetology Institute (0.00/1k); Alamo City Barber College (0.00/1k); CTK Healthcare & Career Institute (0.00/1k); Total Transformation Institute of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy (0.00/1k); McAllen Careers Institute (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at South Texas Training Center?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. South Texas Training Center reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does South Texas Training Center compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Aaniiih Nakoda College at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in TX; same-state same-level scored peers include Ann Webb Skin Institute (0.00/1k); Central Texas Beauty College-Round Rock (0.00/1k); Tri-State Cosmetology Institute (0.00/1k); Alamo City Barber College (0.00/1k); CTK Healthcare & Career Institute (0.00/1k); Total Transformation Institute of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy (0.00/1k); McAllen Careers Institute (0.00/1k).
Does South Texas Training Center have fire safety data?
South Texas Training Center has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.