TX
Clute, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit
Natural Images Beauty College
Natural Images Beauty College reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- 75
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
Natural Images Beauty College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 488110 · Natural Images Beauty College 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UNK State rank n/a
- PEER-FINISH Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater · ±0.00
- ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-NONE No incidents
- ENR-SMALL 75
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater Detroit (+0.00/1k)
Natural Images Beauty College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater Detroit. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater Detroit (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
Natural Images Beauty College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around Natural Images Beauty
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Natural on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- Natural Images Beauty College · this campus · lowest 0
Natural Images Beauty College — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater · near 0
Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater Detroit — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Ross Medical Education Center-Taylor · near 0
Ross Medical Education Center-Taylor — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Nouvelle Institute · near 0
Nouvelle Institute — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Baptist Missionary Association Theological · highest peer
Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary — highest peer
13.33 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Natural Images Beauty College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
Natural Images Beauty College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 37 TX Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Natural Images Beauty College is larger than 56% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Natural Images Beauty Coll…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Academy of Hair Design-Jasper | 52 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 |
| UCAS University of Cosmetology Arts & Sciences-McAllen | 53 | 18.87 | 3 | 0 |
| Laredo CHI Academy Beauty School | 54 | 0.00 | 6 | 3 |
| Texas College of Cosmetology-Lubbock | 54 | 0.00 | 6 | 3 |
| BK Cosmo College of Cosmetology | 55 | 0.00 | 11 | 3 |
| Bella Cosmetology and Barber College | 57 | 0.00 | 14 | 3 |
| Institute of Allied Healthcare | 60 | 0.00 | 17 | 3 |
| Trend Barber College | 61 | 0.00 | 19 | 3 |
| Graduate America College | 62 | 0.00 | 22 | 3 |
| DuVall's School of Cosmetology | 65 | 0.00 | 25 | 3 |
| Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics | 65 | 0.00 | 25 | 3 |
| Natural Images Beauty College (this campus) | 75 | 0.00 | 56 | 3 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
Crime Statistics by Year
The Criminal Offenses section for Natural Images Beauty College is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary.
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
9 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
Natural Images Beauty College vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
TX
Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary
MI
Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater Detroit
Cost context
Where Natural Images Beauty College sits on price and outcomes
At $22,158, Natural Images Beauty College's reported average net price is cheaper than 70% among 337 Texas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,267.
- $22,158
- average net price
- $18,267
- Texas median
Only 41% complete within six years. Most students here do not finish, which is the single most important number on this page for anyone weighing the cost.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. A completion rate describes the cohort, not an individual student's likelihood of finishing.
Academic & Financial Profile
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,132 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Natural Images Beauty College safe?
What crimes are reported at Natural Images Beauty College?
How does Natural Images Beauty College compare to similar schools?
Does Natural Images Beauty College have fire safety data?
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.