Austin, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Ann Webb Skin Institute

Ann Webb Skin Institute reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
121
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Ann Webb Skin Institute reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 490425 · Ann Webb Skin Institute 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Institute for Clinical Social · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 121
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Institute for Clinical Social Work (+0.00/1k)

Ann Webb Skin Institute sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Institute for Clinical Social Work. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Institute for Clinical Social Work (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Ann Webb Skin Institute reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Ann Webb Skin

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Ann on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Ann Webb Skin Institute's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Ann Webb Skin Institute was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 TX Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Ann Webb Skin Institute is larger than 69% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Ann Webb Skin Institute: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Ann Webb Skin Institute: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
William Edge Institute730.0003
Victoria Beauty & Barber College730.0003
Academy of Hair Design-Lufkin740.0063
Southeast Texas Career Institute750.0083
Natural Images Beauty College750.0083
Nuvani Institute770.00143
Baldwin Beauty School-North Austin780.00173
Jay's Technical Institute790.00193
The Salon Professional Academy-Georgetown790.00193
Valley Grande Institute for Academic Studies840.00253
Top of the Line Barber School860.00283
Ann Webb Skin Institute (this campus)1210.00693

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Ann Webb Skin Institute has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Institute for Clinical Social Work.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Ann Webb Skin Institute vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

TX

Ann Webb Skin Institute

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
121
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Ann Webb Skin Institute sits on price and outcomes

See Texas's cost ranking

At $20,056, Ann Webb Skin Institute's reported average net price is cheaper than 59% among 337 Texas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,267.

$20,056
average net price
$18,267
Texas median

85% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. A completion rate describes the cohort, not an individual student's likelihood of finishing.

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,319 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ann Webb Skin Institute safe?
Ann Webb Skin Institute has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 121 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Institute for Clinical Social Work. Same-state same-level set: Central Texas Beauty College-Round Rock (0.00/1k); South Texas Training Center (0.00/1k); Tri-State Cosmetology Institute (0.00/1k); Alamo City Barber College (0.00/1k); CTK Healthcare & Career Institute (0.00/1k); Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy (0.00/1k); McAllen Careers Institute (0.00/1k); Total Transformation Institute of Cosmetology (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Ann Webb Skin Institute?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Ann Webb Skin Institute reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Ann Webb Skin Institute compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Institute for Clinical Social Work at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in TX; same-state same-level scored peers include Central Texas Beauty College-Round Rock (0.00/1k); South Texas Training Center (0.00/1k); Tri-State Cosmetology Institute (0.00/1k); Alamo City Barber College (0.00/1k); CTK Healthcare & Career Institute (0.00/1k); Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy (0.00/1k); McAllen Careers Institute (0.00/1k); Total Transformation Institute of Cosmetology (0.00/1k).
Does Ann Webb Skin Institute have fire safety data?
Ann Webb Skin Institute has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.