Webster, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake

Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
133
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 488989 · Paul Mitchell the School-Clear 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Stewart School · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 133
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Stewart School (+0.00/1k)

Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Stewart School. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Stewart School (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Paul Mitchell the

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Paul on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 TX Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake is larger than 78% and safer-reporting than 6% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting025.550.976.4101.8013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Paul Mitchell the School-C…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Paul Mitchell the School-C…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Southeast Texas Career Institute750.0006
Natural Images Beauty College750.0006
Nuvani Institute770.0066
Baldwin Beauty School-North Austin780.0086
Jay's Technical Institute790.00116
The Salon Professional Academy-Georgetown790.00116
Valley Grande Institute for Academic Studies840.00176
Top of the Line Barber School860.00196
UCAS University of Cosmetology Arts & Sciences-Harlingen870.00226
Vogue College of Cosmetology-San Antonio Fredericksburg900.00256
Advanced Barber College and Hair Design910.00286
Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake (this campus)1330.00786

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Stewart School.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

TX

Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
133
Data year
2024

SD

Stewart School

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
133
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake sits on price and outcomes

See Texas's cost ranking

At $20,472, Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake's reported average net price is cheaper than 61% among 337 Texas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,267.

$20,472
average net price
$18,267
Texas median
2.3×
six-year earnings to median debt
$4,307
reported income-bracket spread

Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $19,958 and those above $110,000 report $24,265, a difference of just $4,307. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.

Median earnings six years after entry ($26,017) are less than 1.3 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 83% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$26,017
Median Earnings (10yr)
$27,384
Loan Repayment (3yr)
44%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,336 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake safe?
Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 133 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Stewart School. Same-state same-level set: The Salon Professional Academy-Lewisville (0.00/1k); Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy (0.00/1k); McAllen Careers Institute (0.00/1k); Houston Training Schools-Gessner (0.00/1k); Avenue Five Institute-South Austin Campus (21.58/1k); Tri-State Cosmetology Institute (0.00/1k); Central Texas Beauty College-Round Rock (0.00/1k); Ann Webb Skin Institute (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake compare to similar schools?
Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Stewart School. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Stewart School (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Logan (0.00/1k); Arizona College of Nursing-Sarasota (0.00/1k); International School of Beauty Inc (0.00/1k); St. John's College-Department of Nursing (75.76/1k). Same-state same-level set: The Salon Professional Academy-Lewisville (0.00/1k); Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy (0.00/1k); McAllen Careers Institute (0.00/1k); Houston Training Schools-Gessner (0.00/1k); Avenue Five Institute-South Austin Campus (21.58/1k); Tri-State Cosmetology Institute (0.00/1k); Central Texas Beauty College-Round Rock (0.00/1k); Ann Webb Skin Institute (0.00/1k).
Does Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake have fire safety data?
Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.