Grand Prairie, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

M T Training Center

M T Training Center reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
293
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

M T Training Center reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 481003 · M T Training Center 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Cleveland Institute of Music · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 293
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Cleveland Institute of Music (+0.00/1k)

M T Training Center sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Cleveland Institute of Music. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Cleveland Institute of Music (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

M T Training Center reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around M T Training

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest M on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around M T Training Center's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

M T Training Center was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 TX Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, M T Training Center is larger than 61% and safer-reporting than 17% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17M T Training Center: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • M T Training Center: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake1330.00017
Houston Training Schools-Gessner1380.00317
Avenue Five Institute-South Austin Campus13921.5860
The Professional Cosmetology Academy1460.00817
CyberTex Institute of Technology1520.001117
Cortiva Institute-Arlington1550.001417
Tonsorial Arts Barber College1705.88176
Paul Mitchell the School-Austin1710.001917
GA Beauty & Barber School1710.001917
Ocean Corporation1920.002517
Houston Training School-Main Campus19820.20283
M T Training Center (this campus)2930.006117

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for M T Training Center is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Cleveland Institute of Music.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

M T Training Center vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

TX

M T Training Center

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
293
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where M T Training Center sits on price and outcomes

See Texas's cost ranking

At $11,362, M T Training Center's reported average net price is cheaper than 27% among 337 Texas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,267.

$11,362
average net price
$18,267
Texas median
4.7×
six-year earnings to median debt

Median reported earnings six years after entry are $31,880, roughly 2.8 times a year of net price. That is a workable ratio, though it says nothing about how long the programme takes to finish. 80% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,221 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is M T Training Center safe?
M T Training Center has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 293 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Cleveland Institute of Music. Same-state same-level set: Paul Mitchell the School-Houston (0.00/1k); Northwest Educational Center (0.00/1k); CCI Training Center-Arlington (0.00/1k); Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-North Dallas (0.00/1k); Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-Hurst (0.00/1k); Milan Institute-Amarillo (0.00/1k); Avenue Five Institute (3.16/1k); Miller-Motte College-STVT-Arlington (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at M T Training Center?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. M T Training Center reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does M T Training Center compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Cleveland Institute of Music at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in TX; same-state same-level scored peers include Paul Mitchell the School-Houston (0.00/1k); Northwest Educational Center (0.00/1k); CCI Training Center-Arlington (0.00/1k); Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-North Dallas (0.00/1k); Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-Hurst (0.00/1k); Milan Institute-Amarillo (0.00/1k); Avenue Five Institute (3.16/1k); Miller-Motte College-STVT-Arlington (0.00/1k).
Does M T Training Center have fire safety data?
M T Training Center has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.