Austin, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

CyberTex Institute of Technology

CyberTex Institute of Technology reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
152
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

CyberTex Institute of Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 480888 · CyberTex Institute of Technology 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Schilling-Douglas School of Hair · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 152
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Schilling-Douglas School of Hair Design (+0.00/1k)

CyberTex Institute of Technology sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Schilling-Douglas School of Hair Design. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Schilling-Douglas School of Hair Design (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

CyberTex Institute of Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around CyberTex Institute of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest CyberTex on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around CyberTex Institute of Technology's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

CyberTex Institute of Technology was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 TX Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, CyberTex Institute of Technology is larger than 75% and safer-reporting than 11% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8CyberTex Institute of Tech…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • CyberTex Institute of Tech…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Jay's Technical Institute790.00011
Valley Grande Institute for Academic Studies840.00311
Top of the Line Barber School860.00611
UCAS University of Cosmetology Arts & Sciences-Harlingen870.00811
Vogue College of Cosmetology-San Antonio Fredericksburg900.001111
Advanced Barber College and Hair Design910.001411
Mei Barber School910.001411
Vogue College of Cosmetology920.001911
The Culinary School of Fort Worth920.001911
Salon Professional Academy of San Antonio940.002511
Deluxe Barber College940.002511
CyberTex Institute of Technology (this campus)1520.007511

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for CyberTex Institute of Technology is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Schilling-Douglas School of Hair Design.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

18 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
18 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

CyberTex Institute of Technology vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

TX

CyberTex Institute of Technology

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
152
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where CyberTex Institute of Technology sits on price and outcomes

See Texas's cost ranking

At $33,163, CyberTex Institute of Technology's reported average net price is cheaper than 96% among 337 Texas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,267.

$33,163
average net price
$18,267
Texas median
3.6×
six-year earnings to median debt

Median earnings six years after entry ($28,042) are less than one year of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 91% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,335 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CyberTex Institute of Technology safe?
CyberTex Institute of Technology has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 152 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Schilling-Douglas School of Hair Design. Same-state same-level set: Cortiva Institute-Arlington (0.00/1k); The Professional Cosmetology Academy (0.00/1k); Avenue Five Institute-South Austin Campus (21.58/1k); Houston Training Schools-Gessner (0.00/1k); Tonsorial Arts Barber College (5.88/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Austin (0.00/1k); GA Beauty & Barber School (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at CyberTex Institute of Technology?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. CyberTex Institute of Technology reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does CyberTex Institute of Technology compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Schilling-Douglas School of Hair Design at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in TX; same-state same-level scored peers include Cortiva Institute-Arlington (0.00/1k); The Professional Cosmetology Academy (0.00/1k); Avenue Five Institute-South Austin Campus (21.58/1k); Houston Training Schools-Gessner (0.00/1k); Tonsorial Arts Barber College (5.88/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Austin (0.00/1k); GA Beauty & Barber School (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Clear Lake (0.00/1k).
Does CyberTex Institute of Technology have fire safety data?
CyberTex Institute of Technology has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.