Fort Worth, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

The Culinary School of Fort Worth

The Culinary School of Fort Worth reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
92
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

The Culinary School of Fort Worth reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 491251 · The Culinary School of 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Jefferson Regional School of · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 92
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Jefferson Regional School of Nursing (+0.00/1k)

The Culinary School of Fort Worth sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Jefferson Regional School of Nursing. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Jefferson Regional School of Nursing (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

The Culinary School of Fort Worth reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around The Culinary School

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest The on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around The Culinary School of Fort Worth's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

The Culinary School of Fort Worth was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 TX Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, The Culinary School of Fort Worth is larger than 69% and safer-reporting than 0% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0The Culinary School of For…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • The Culinary School of For…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Trend Barber College610.0000
Graduate America College620.0030
DuVall's School of Cosmetology650.0060
Strand Institute of Beauty & Esthetics650.0060
CET-El Paso670.00110
Charles and Sues School of Hair Design690.00140
Pearlands Innovative School of Beauty690.00140
Salon & Spa Institute710.00190
Texas College of Cosmetology-San Angelo720.00220
Peloton College720.00220
William Edge Institute730.00280
The Culinary School of Fort Worth (this campus)920.00690

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for The Culinary School of Fort Worth is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Jefferson Regional School of Nursing.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

The Culinary School of Fort Worth vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

TX

The Culinary School of Fort Worth

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
92
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where The Culinary School of Fort Worth sits on price and outcomes

See Texas's cost ranking

At $24,296, The Culinary School of Fort Worth's reported average net price is cheaper than 77% among 337 Texas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,267.

$24,296
average net price
$18,267
Texas median
$6,470
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $23,283 for families reporting under $30,000 against $29,753 above $110,000, a difference of $6,470. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $24,296 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

79% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. A completion rate describes the cohort, not an individual student's likelihood of finishing.

Academic & Financial Profile

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
78%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,256 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is The Culinary School of Fort Worth safe?
The Culinary School of Fort Worth has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 92 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Jefferson Regional School of Nursing. Same-state same-level set: Vogue College of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Advanced Barber College and Hair Design (0.00/1k); Mei Barber School (0.00/1k); Vogue College of Cosmetology-San Antonio Fredericksburg (0.00/1k); Salon Professional Academy of San Antonio (0.00/1k); Deluxe Barber College (0.00/1k); Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy-Lubbock (0.00/1k); UCAS University of Cosmetology Arts & Sciences-Harlingen (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at The Culinary School of Fort Worth?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. The Culinary School of Fort Worth reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does The Culinary School of Fort Worth compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Jefferson Regional School of Nursing at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in TX; same-state same-level scored peers include Vogue College of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Advanced Barber College and Hair Design (0.00/1k); Mei Barber School (0.00/1k); Vogue College of Cosmetology-San Antonio Fredericksburg (0.00/1k); Salon Professional Academy of San Antonio (0.00/1k); Deluxe Barber College (0.00/1k); Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy-Lubbock (0.00/1k); UCAS University of Cosmetology Arts & Sciences-Harlingen (0.00/1k).
Does The Culinary School of Fort Worth have fire safety data?
The Culinary School of Fort Worth has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.