Brooklyn, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Yeshiva of Kasho

Yeshiva of Kasho reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
185
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Yeshiva of Kasho reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 498809 · Yeshiva of Kasho 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Chief Dull Knife College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 185
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Chief Dull Knife College (+0.00/1k)

Yeshiva of Kasho sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Chief Dull Knife College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Chief Dull Knife College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Yeshiva of Kasho reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Yeshiva of Kasho

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Yeshiva on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Yeshiva of Kasho's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Yeshiva of Kasho was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY 4-year peers in this comparison, Yeshiva of Kasho is larger than 58% and safer-reporting than 8% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting025.550.976.4101.8013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Yeshiva of Kasho: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Yeshiva of Kasho: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Webb Institute1069.4303
DeVry College of New York1070.0038
Bet Medrash Gadol Ateret Torah1120.0068
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim1130.0088
Rabbinical College Ohr Yisroel1140.00118
Elim Bible Institute and College1180.00148
Mechon L'hoyroa1220.00178
Machzikei Hadath Rabbinical College1310.00198
Yeshiva Sholom Shachna1320.00228
Mirrer Yeshiva Cent Institute1390.00258
St Bernard's School of Theology and Ministry1440.00288
Yeshiva of Kasho (this campus)1850.00588

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Yeshiva of Kasho has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Chief Dull Knife College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Yeshiva of Kasho vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

Yeshiva of Kasho

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
185
Data year
2024

MA

FINE Mortuary College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
185
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Yeshiva of Kasho sits on price and outcomes

See New York's cost ranking

At $9,200, Yeshiva of Kasho's reported average net price is cheaper than 20% among 326 New York colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,940.

$9,200
average net price
$17,940
New York median

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$14,000
Out-of-State Tuition
$14,000
Avg Net Price
$9,200
Pell Grant Recipients
82%
How does this cost rank in NY? →

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
11%
Retention Rate
90%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,305 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yeshiva of Kasho safe?
Yeshiva of Kasho has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 185 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Chief Dull Knife College. Same-state same-level set: Sotheby's Institute of Art-NY (0.00/1k); New York College of Traditional Chinese Medicine (0.00/1k); Congregation Talmidei Mesivta Tiferes Shmiel Aleksander (0.00/1k); Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Karlin Stolin (0.00/1k); Beis Medrash Heichal Dovid (0.00/1k); Rabbinical College of Long Island (0.00/1k); Yeshivas Novominsk (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Yeshiva of Kasho?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Yeshiva of Kasho reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Yeshiva of Kasho compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Chief Dull Knife College at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in NY; same-state same-level scored peers include Sotheby's Institute of Art-NY (0.00/1k); New York College of Traditional Chinese Medicine (0.00/1k); Congregation Talmidei Mesivta Tiferes Shmiel Aleksander (0.00/1k); Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Karlin Stolin (0.00/1k); Beis Medrash Heichal Dovid (0.00/1k); Rabbinical College of Long Island (0.00/1k); Yeshivas Novominsk (0.00/1k).
Does Yeshiva of Kasho have fire safety data?
Yes. Yeshiva of Kasho reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.