Ossining, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary

Across 2022–2024, Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary reported 1 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, with no net change between the first and last filed year; largest filed category is Burglary.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
205
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 192165 · Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Gwinnett College-Marietta Campus · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-LEAD Burglary
  • ENR-SMALL 205
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Gwinnett College-Marietta Campus (+0.00/1k)

Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Gwinnett College-Marietta Campus. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Gwinnett College-Marietta Campus (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Kehilath on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

-1 reported incidents

Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary decreased from 1 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY 4-year peers in this comparison, Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary is larger than 64% and safer-reporting than 8% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting025.550.976.4101.8013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical …: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical …: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Webb Institute1069.4303
DeVry College of New York1070.0038
Bet Medrash Gadol Ateret Torah1120.0068
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim1130.0088
Rabbinical College Ohr Yisroel1140.00118
Elim Bible Institute and College1180.00148
Mechon L'hoyroa1220.00178
Machzikei Hadath Rabbinical College1310.00198
Yeshiva Sholom Shachna1320.00228
Mirrer Yeshiva Cent Institute1390.00258
St Bernard's School of Theology and Ministry1440.00288
Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary (this campus)2050.00648

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What changed between 2023 and 2024

Reported on-campus incidents at Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary fell from 1 to 0 (-100%). The decrease shows up in Burglary (1 to 0).

This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.

What actually gets reported at Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Burglary.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Fondling and Incest. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary: Criminal Offenses by year

Stable

00.511.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 0On-campus incidents, 2023: 1On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 0 0 ▲ +0.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Burglary 010
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Motor Vehicle Theft 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
205
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary sits on price and outcomes

See New York's cost ranking

At $3,822, Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary's reported average net price is among the lowest reported prices among 326 New York colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,940.

$3,822
average net price
$17,940
New York median

Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $25,819 - about 6.8 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$13,200
Out-of-State Tuition
$13,200
Avg Net Price
$3,822
Pell Grant Recipients
82%
How does this cost rank in NY? →

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
54%
Retention Rate
100%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$25,819
Median Earnings (10yr)
$36,442

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,265 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary safe?
Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 205 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Research College of Nursing. Same-state same-level set: Beis Medrash Heichal Dovid (0.00/1k); Northeastern Seminary (50.46/1k); Sotheby's Institute of Art-NY (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Yesoda Hatorah Vetz Chaim (0.00/1k); Yeshiva of Kasho (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Gedolah Imrei Yosef D'spinka (0.00/1k); Beth Medrash Meor Yitzchok (0.00/1k); Rabbinical College of Ohr Shimon Yisroel (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary compare to similar schools?
Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Research College of Nursing. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Research College of Nursing (253.66/1k); Gwinnett College-Marietta Campus (0.00/1k); Nova Academy of Cosmetology (4.88/1k); Northwest Technical Institute (0.00/1k); Los Angeles County College of Nursing and Allied Health (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Beis Medrash Heichal Dovid (0.00/1k); Northeastern Seminary (50.46/1k); Sotheby's Institute of Art-NY (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Yesoda Hatorah Vetz Chaim (0.00/1k); Yeshiva of Kasho (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Gedolah Imrei Yosef D'spinka (0.00/1k); Beth Medrash Meor Yitzchok (0.00/1k); Rabbinical College of Ohr Shimon Yisroel (0.00/1k).
Does Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary have fire safety data?
Yes. Kehilath Yakov Rabbinical Seminary reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.