Lakewood, NJ · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village

Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
87
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 493707 · Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 87
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah (+0.00/1k)

Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Yeshiva Gedolah of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Yeshiva on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NJ 4-year peers in this comparison, Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village is larger than 33% and safer-reporting than 11% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlak…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlak…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Yeshiva Bais Aharon250.00011
Yeshiva Gedolah of Cliffwood300.00311
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah380.00611
Eastern School of Acupuncture and Traditional Medicine420.00811
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Leyma470.001111
Keser Torah-Mayan Hatalmud570.001411
DeVry University-New Jersey670.001711
Talmudical Academy-New Jersey720.001911
Yeshiva Chemdas Hatorah720.001911
Yeshiva Gedola Tiferes Yaakov Yitzchok720.001911
Yeshiva Yesodei Hatorah760.002811
Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village (this campus)870.003311

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NJ

Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
87
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village sits on price and outcomes

See New Jersey's cost ranking

At $13,891, Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village's reported average net price is cheaper than 38% among 129 New Jersey colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,173.

$13,891
average net price
$18,173
New Jersey median

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$9,030
Out-of-State Tuition
$9,030
Avg Net Price
$13,891
Pell Grant Recipients
35%
How does this cost rank in NJ? →

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
84%

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
56%
Retention Rate
71%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,221 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village safe?
Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 87 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah. Same-state same-level set: Yeshivas Be'er Yitzchok (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Gedolah Tiferes Boruch (0.00/1k); Rabbinical Seminary Mkor Chaim (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Yesodei Hatorah (0.00/1k); Yeshivas Emek Hatorah (0.00/1k); Talmudical Academy-New Jersey (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Chemdas Hatorah (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Gedola Tiferes Yaakov Yitzchok (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in NJ; same-state same-level scored peers include Yeshivas Be'er Yitzchok (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Gedolah Tiferes Boruch (0.00/1k); Rabbinical Seminary Mkor Chaim (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Yesodei Hatorah (0.00/1k); Yeshivas Emek Hatorah (0.00/1k); Talmudical Academy-New Jersey (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Chemdas Hatorah (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Gedola Tiferes Yaakov Yitzchok (0.00/1k).
Does Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village have fire safety data?
Yes. Yeshiva Gedolah of Woodlake Village reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.