Baltimore, MD · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College

Across 2022–2024, Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College reported 1 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count fell over that span (largest filed category: Motor Vehicle Theft). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: Bais HaMedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
161
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 491631 · Women's Institute of Torah 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Southern California Seminary · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-DOWN ↓ 100%
  • CAT-LEAD Motor Vehicle Th…
  • ENR-SMALL 161
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Southern California Seminary (+0.00/1k)

Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Southern California Seminary. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Southern California Seminary (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Women's Institute of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Women's on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 32 MD 4-year peers in this comparison, Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College is larger than 6% and safer-reporting than 77% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105020.240.460.680.8Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 77Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 77Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 10 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 77Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 13 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 77Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 16 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 77Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 23 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 45Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 26 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 77Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 29 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 77Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 32 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 65Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 35 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 23Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 55Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 45 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 74Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 48 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 52 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 10Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 55 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 52Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 71Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 65 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 68 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 71 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 48Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 74 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 77 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 68Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 29Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 84 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 32Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 87 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 26Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 90 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 13Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 35Women's Institute of Torah…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 77
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 77
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 77
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 10, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 77
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 13, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 77
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 16, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 77
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 23, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 45
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 26, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 77
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 29, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 77
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 32, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 65
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 35, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 23
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 55
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 45, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 74
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 52, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 10
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 55, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 52
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 71
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 65, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 68, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 71, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 48
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 74, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 77, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 68
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 29
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 84, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 32
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 87, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 26
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 90, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 13
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 35
  • Women's Institute of Torah…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 77
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Yeshiva College of the Nations Capital560.00077
Bais HaMedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore870.00377
Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College (this campus)1610.00677
Ner Israel Rabbinical College4490.001077
Maryland University of Integrative Health5440.001377
St. John's College5836.861619
Washington Adventist University6120.001977
Washington College9235.422345
Capitol Technology University1,0650.002677
Strayer University-Maryland1,2900.002977
Goucher College1,4592.063265
St. Mary's College of Maryland1,63015.95350

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What actually gets reported at Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Motor Vehicle Theft.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Burglary and Fondling. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College: Criminal Offenses by year

Declining 100% (1 → 0 incidents)

00.511.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 1On-campus incidents, 2023: 0On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 1 0 ▼ -100.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Motor Vehicle Theft 001
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Burglary 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MD

Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
161
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College sits on price and outcomes

See Maryland's cost ranking

At $11,673, Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College's reported average net price is cheaper than 27% among 67 Maryland colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,140.

$11,673
average net price
$17,140
Maryland median

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$9,780
Out-of-State Tuition
$9,780
Avg Net Price
$11,673
Pell Grant Recipients
24%
How does this cost rank in MD? →

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
98%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,342 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College safe?
Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 161 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Southern California Seminary. Same-state same-level set: Bais HaMedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore (0.00/1k); Yeshiva College of the Nations Capital (0.00/1k); Ner Israel Rabbinical College (0.00/1k); Maryland University of Integrative Health (0.00/1k); St. John's College (6.86/1k); Washington Adventist University (0.00/1k); Washington College (5.42/1k); Capitol Technology University (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Southern California Seminary at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in MD; same-state same-level scored peers include Bais HaMedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore (0.00/1k); Yeshiva College of the Nations Capital (0.00/1k); Ner Israel Rabbinical College (0.00/1k); Maryland University of Integrative Health (0.00/1k); St. John's College (6.86/1k); Washington Adventist University (0.00/1k); Washington College (5.42/1k); Capitol Technology University (0.00/1k).
Does Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College have fire safety data?
Women's Institute of Torah Seminary and College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.