Dubuque, IA · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Wartburg Theological Seminary

Wartburg Theological Seminary reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
161
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Wartburg Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 154536 · Wartburg Theological Seminary 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Southern California Seminary · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 161
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Southern California Seminary (+0.00/1k)

Wartburg Theological Seminary sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Southern California Seminary. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Southern California Seminary (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Wartburg Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Wartburg Theological Seminary

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Wartburg on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Wartburg Theological Seminary's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Wartburg Theological Seminary was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 IA 4-year peers in this comparison, Wartburg Theological Seminary is larger than 6% and safer-reporting than 83% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105021.843.665.487.2Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 83Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 83Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 83Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 83Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 83Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 83Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 81Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 78Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Wartburg Theological Semin…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 83
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 83
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 83
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 83
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 83
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 83
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 83
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 81
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 78
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Wartburg Theological Semin…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 83
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Orion Technical College410.00083
Divine Word College640.00383
Wartburg Theological Seminary (this campus)1610.00683
St Luke's College1760.00883
Emmaus Bible College2340.001183
Allen College4832.071467
Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary6110.001783
Mercy College of Health Sciences8693.451950
Briar Cliff University9472.112264
Clarke University9624.162544
Central College1,0847.382819
Cornell College1,0944.573133

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Wartburg Theological Seminary has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Southern California Seminary.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Wartburg Theological Seminary vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

IA

Wartburg Theological Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
161
Data year
2024

MI

Kuyper College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
161
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,342 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Wartburg Theological Seminary safe?
Wartburg Theological Seminary has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 161 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Southern California Seminary. Same-state same-level set: St Luke's College (0.00/1k); Emmaus Bible College (0.00/1k); Divine Word College (0.00/1k); Orion Technical College (0.00/1k); Allen College (2.07/1k); Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Mercy College of Health Sciences (3.45/1k); Briar Cliff University (2.11/1k).
What crimes are reported at Wartburg Theological Seminary?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Wartburg Theological Seminary reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Wartburg Theological Seminary compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Southern California Seminary at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in IA; same-state same-level scored peers include St Luke's College (0.00/1k); Emmaus Bible College (0.00/1k); Divine Word College (0.00/1k); Orion Technical College (0.00/1k); Allen College (2.07/1k); Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Mercy College of Health Sciences (3.45/1k); Briar Cliff University (2.11/1k).
Does Wartburg Theological Seminary have fire safety data?
Yes. Wartburg Theological Seminary reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.