Los Angeles, CA · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

The Chicago School at Los Angeles

The Chicago School at Los Angeles reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#66
CA rank
3,344
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

The Chicago School at Los Angeles reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 455664 · The Chicago School at 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #66 in state
  • BELOW-PEER Black Hills State University · 0.90 back
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 3,344
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Black Hills State University (+0.90/1k)

The Chicago School at Los Angeles sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Black Hills State University. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Black Hills State University (+0.90/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

The Chicago School at Los Angeles reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around The Chicago School

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest The on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around The Chicago School at Los Angeles's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

The Chicago School at Los Angeles was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CA 4-year peers in this comparison, The Chicago School at Los Angeles is larger than 75% and safer-reporting than 64% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105016.833.650.467.2Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8The Chicago School at Los …: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • The Chicago School at Los …: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Los Angeles Pacific University1,8810.00064
Occidental College1,8817.9708
Fuller Theological Seminary1,8904.23619
Dominican University of California1,9002.63831
Samuel Merritt University1,9260.001164
Southern California University of Health Sciences2,0080.001464
Feather River Community College District2,0550.491750
California Institute of Arts & Technology2,1120.001964
Carrington College-Sacramento2,2070.452253
Vanguard University of Southern California2,2461.782536
Art Center College of Design2,3080.002864
The Chicago School at Los Angeles (this campus)3,3440.007564

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), The Chicago School at Los Angeles has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Honolulu Community College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

The Chicago School at Los Angeles vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CA

The Chicago School at Los Angeles

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
3,344
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$21,780
Out-of-State Tuition
$21,780
Median Debt
$20,000
Pell Grant Recipients
56%

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
46%

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$51,817
Median Earnings (10yr)
$56,899

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,231 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for The Chicago School at Los Angeles, both outside CA so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is The Chicago School at Los Angeles safe?
The Chicago School at Los Angeles has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include California Lutheran University (3.88/1k); Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts (0.00/1k); Golden Gate University (0.32/1k); University of Redlands (4.86/1k); Concordia University-Irvine (1.09/1k); Western University of Health Sciences (3.00/1k); University of California-San Francisco (43.56/1k); Stanbridge University (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at The Chicago School at Los Angeles?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. The Chicago School at Los Angeles reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does The Chicago School at Los Angeles compare to similar schools?
The Chicago School at Los Angeles reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Honolulu Community College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Honolulu Community College (1.20/1k); Marion Technical College (1.20/1k); Black Hills State University (0.90/1k); Clarkson University (1.49/1k); Olivet Nazarene University (3.59/1k). Same-state same-level set: California Lutheran University (3.88/1k); Gurnick Academy of Medical Arts (0.00/1k); Golden Gate University (0.32/1k); University of Redlands (4.86/1k); Concordia University-Irvine (1.09/1k); Western University of Health Sciences (3.00/1k); University of California-San Francisco (43.56/1k); Stanbridge University (0.00/1k).
Does The Chicago School at Los Angeles have fire safety data?
The Chicago School at Los Angeles has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.