San Diego, CA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

California Institute of Arts & Technology

Across 2022–2024, California Institute of Arts & Technology reported 1 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count fell over that span (largest filed category: Motor Vehicle Theft). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: Feather River Community College District.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#86
CA rank
2,112
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

California Institute of Arts & Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 490285 · California Institute of Arts 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #86 in state
  • PEER-FINISH University of Mount Olive · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-DOWN ↓ 100%
  • CAT-LEAD Motor Vehicle Th…
  • ENR-SMALL 2,112
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: University of Mount Olive (+0.00/1k)

California Institute of Arts & Technology sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer University of Mount Olive. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is University of Mount Olive (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

California Institute of Arts & Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around California Institute of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest California on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around California Institute of Arts & Technology's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

California Institute of Arts & Technology was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CA 4-year peers in this comparison, California Institute of Arts & Technology is larger than 53% and safer-reporting than 72% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105018.937.856.775.6Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0California Institute of Ar…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • California Institute of Ar…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Pitzer College1,2427.25019
Otis College of Art and Design1,2673.95331
California Institute of the Arts1,2774.70625
California College of the Arts1,3083.82833
Westmont College1,3103.821139
Claremont McKenna College1,39316.51148
La Sierra University1,5748.261714
CBD College1,5810.001972
Pomona College1,70034.71223
Claremont Graduate University1,7712.822542
William Jessup University1,8651.072856
California Institute of Arts & Technology (this campus)2,1120.005372

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What actually gets reported at California Institute of Arts & Technology

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Motor Vehicle Theft.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Burglary and Fondling. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

California Institute of Arts & Technology: Criminal Offenses by year

Declining 100% (1 → 0 incidents)

00.511.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 1On-campus incidents, 2023: 0On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 1 0 ▼ -100.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Motor Vehicle Theft 001
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Burglary 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

California Institute of Arts & Technology vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CA

California Institute of Arts & Technology

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
2,112
Data year
2024

NH

Saint Anselm College

6.16 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#1,732
Enrollment
2,111
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where California Institute of Arts & Technology sits on price and outcomes

See California's cost ranking

At $32,637, California Institute of Arts & Technology's reported average net price is cheaper than 84% among 492 California colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $20,161.

$32,637
average net price
$20,161
California median

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$22,270
Out-of-State Tuition
$22,270
Avg Net Price
$32,637
Median Debt
$22,209
Pell Grant Recipients
32%
How does this cost rank in CA? →

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
65%
Retention Rate
63%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,318 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for California Institute of Arts & Technology, both outside CA so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is California Institute of Arts & Technology safe?
California Institute of Arts & Technology has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Feather River Community College District (0.49/1k); Carrington College-Sacramento (0.45/1k); Southern California University of Health Sciences (0.00/1k); Vanguard University of Southern California (1.78/1k); Samuel Merritt University (0.00/1k); Art Center College of Design (0.00/1k); Mount Saint Mary's University (18.60/1k); San Joaquin Valley College-Visalia (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at California Institute of Arts & Technology?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. California Institute of Arts & Technology reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does California Institute of Arts & Technology compare to similar schools?
California Institute of Arts & Technology reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Saint Anselm College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Saint Anselm College (6.16/1k); University of Evansville (6.62/1k); Strayer University-South Carolina (1.42/1k); Kansas City University (0.47/1k); University of Mount Olive (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Feather River Community College District (0.49/1k); Carrington College-Sacramento (0.45/1k); Southern California University of Health Sciences (0.00/1k); Vanguard University of Southern California (1.78/1k); Samuel Merritt University (0.00/1k); Art Center College of Design (0.00/1k); Mount Saint Mary's University (18.60/1k); San Joaquin Valley College-Visalia (0.00/1k).
Does California Institute of Arts & Technology have fire safety data?
California Institute of Arts & Technology has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.