Miami, FL · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

South Florida Institute of Technology

South Florida Institute of Technology reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#44
FL rank
9,747
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

South Florida Institute of Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 443252 · South Florida Institute of 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-MID · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #44 in state
  • BELOW-PEER California State University-Stanislaus · 2.06 back
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-MID 9,747
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: California State University-Stanislaus (+2.06/1k)

South Florida Institute of Technology sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-MID · FIRE-NONE · peer California State University-Stanislaus. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-MID · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is California State University-Stanislaus (+2.06/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

South Florida Institute of Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around South Florida Institute

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest South on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around South Florida Institute of Technology's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

South Florida Institute of Technology was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 FL Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, South Florida Institute of Technology is larger than 100% and safer-reporting than 11% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11South Florida Institute of…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • South Florida Institute of…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Emerald Coast Technical College2350.00011
Hollywood Institute of Beauty Careers-West Palm Beach2390.00311
Florida Barber Academy2440.00611
Artistic Nails and Beauty Academy-Tampa2530.00811
Hollywood Institute of Beauty Careers-Casselberry2730.001111
Aveda Institute-Fort Myers2830.001411
Latin Beauty Academy2830.001411
Cape Coral Technical College2973.37190
Robert Fiance Beauty Schools3100.002211
Bene's Career Academy3210.002511
Aparicio-Levy Technical College3290.002811
South Florida Institute of Technology (this campus)9,7470.0010011

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for South Florida Institute of Technology is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Chapman University.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

South Florida Institute of Technology vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

FL

South Florida Institute of Technology

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
9,747
Data year
2024

CA

Chapman University

2.97 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#1,273
Enrollment
9,760
Data year
2024

CA

Santa Clara University

3.91 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#1,469
Enrollment
9,728
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where South Florida Institute of Technology sits on price and outcomes

See Florida's cost ranking

At $31,695, South Florida Institute of Technology's reported average net price is cheaper than 86% among 263 Florida colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $19,849.

$31,695
average net price
$19,849
Florida median
3.4×
six-year earnings to median debt

Median earnings six years after entry ($32,335) are less than 1.0 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 79% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$32,335
Median Earnings (10yr)
$28,570
Loan Repayment (3yr)
78%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 803 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for South Florida Institute of Technology, both outside FL so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is South Florida Institute of Technology safe?
South Florida Institute of Technology has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Lively Technical College (0.00/1k); Osceola Technical College (0.00/1k); George T Baker Aviation Technical College (0.00/1k); Tulsa Welding School-Jacksonville (1.03/1k); Aveda Institute-South Florida (0.00/1k); Lake Technical College (0.00/1k); Lorenzo Walker Technical College (0.00/1k); Celebrity School of Beauty (1.17/1k).
What crimes are reported at South Florida Institute of Technology?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. South Florida Institute of Technology reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does South Florida Institute of Technology compare to similar schools?
South Florida Institute of Technology reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Chapman University. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Chapman University (2.97/1k); Santa Clara University (3.91/1k); Bridgewater State University (3.29/1k); California State University-Stanislaus (2.06/1k); University of San Diego (5.66/1k). Same-state same-level set: Lively Technical College (0.00/1k); Osceola Technical College (0.00/1k); George T Baker Aviation Technical College (0.00/1k); Tulsa Welding School-Jacksonville (1.03/1k); Aveda Institute-South Florida (0.00/1k); Lake Technical College (0.00/1k); Lorenzo Walker Technical College (0.00/1k); Celebrity School of Beauty (1.17/1k).
Does South Florida Institute of Technology have fire safety data?
South Florida Institute of Technology has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.