Kaysville, UT · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Davis Technical College

Across 2022–2024, Davis Technical College reported 8 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count fell over that span (largest filed category: Fondling). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: Ogden-Weber Technical College.

0.48
Incidents / 1k students
#323
Rank of 2,072
#9
UT rank
4,188
Enrolled students

0.48 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Davis Technical College reports 0.48 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 - 81% below Gannon University. Similar-enrollment scored peers: Gannon University (1.19/1k); Wentworth Institute of Technology (9.31/1k); Lindsey Wilson College (1.43/1k); Laramie County Community College (0.48/1k); Holyoke Community College (0.24/1k). Same-state same-level set also includes Ogden-Weber Technical College (0.48/1k); Mountainland Technical College (0.00/1k); Uintah Basin Technical College (0.50/1k); Bridgerland Technical College (0.00/1k); Dixie Technical College (0.00/1k); Southwest Technical College (2.31/1k); Tooele Technical College (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Salt Lake City (0.00/1k). Largest Criminal Offenses total across filed years: Fondling.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.48
of 2,072 ranked nationally
#323
safer than ranked campuses its size
84%
Criminal Offenses, 2024
2
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 230162 · Davis Technical College 0.48/1k score rate · #323/2,072

RATE-QUIET · RANK-UPPER · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-NONE · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-QUIET 0.48/1k
  • RANK-UPPER #323/2,072
  • ST-UPPER #9 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Laramie County Community College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-NONE Scored
  • TREND-DOWN ↓ 33%
  • CAT-LEAD Fondling
  • ENR-SMALL 4,188
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Laramie County Community College (-0.00/1k)

Davis Technical College sheet RATE-QUIET · RANK-UPPER · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-NONE · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Laramie County Community College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-QUIET · RANK-UPPER · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-NONE · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Laramie County Community College (-0.00/1k). National rank #323 of 2,072 scored campuses. Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Davis Technical College reports 0.48 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 - 81% below Gannon University. Similar-enrollment scored peers: Gannon University (1.19/1k); Wentworth Institute of Technology (9.31/1k); Lindsey Wilson College (1.43/1k); Laramie County Community College (0.48/1k); Holyoke Community College (0.24/1k). Same-state same-level set also includes Ogden-Weber Technical College (0.48/1k); Mountainland Technical College (0.00/1k); Uintah Basin Technical College (0.50/1k); Bridgerland Technical College (0.00/1k); Dixie Technical College (0.00/1k); Southwest Technical College (2.31/1k); Tooele Technical College (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Salt Lake City (0.00/1k). Largest Criminal Offenses total across filed years: Fondling.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Davis Technical College

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Davis on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Davis Technical College's 0.48/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

-1 reported incidents

Davis Technical College decreased from 3 to 2 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 32 UT Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Davis Technical College is larger than 97% and safer-reporting than 10% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 13Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 90 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 87 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 84 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 77 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 74 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 71 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 68 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 65 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 55 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 48 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 48 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 45 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 35 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 35 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 32 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 29 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 26 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 23 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 16 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 13 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 10 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Davis Technical College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 10
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 13
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 90, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 87, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 84, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 77, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 74, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 71, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 68, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 65, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 55, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 45, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 35, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 35, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 32, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 29, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 26, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 23, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 16, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 13, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 10, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Davis Technical College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 10
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
American Beauty Academy-West Valley Campus180.00016
American Beauty Academy200.00316
Bonnie Joseph Academy of Cosmetology & Barbering200.00316
Healing Mountain Massage School430.001016
Mandalyn Academy550.001316
Zion Massage College560.001616
Collectiv Academy700.001916
Top Nails & Hair Beauty School920.002316
Paul Mitchell the School-St. George1090.002616
Acaydia School of Aesthetics1130.002916
Skinworks School of Advanced Skincare1178.55320
Davis Technical College (this campus)4,1880.489710

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What changed between 2023 and 2024

Reported on-campus incidents at Davis Technical College fell from 3 to 2 (-33%). The increase shows up in Fondling (1 to 2). Falling over the same period: Aggravated Assault (1 to 0) and Arson (1 to 0).

This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.

What actually gets reported at Davis Technical College

Across 3 reporting years, on-campus incidents were recorded in 3 Clery Act categories here: Fondling, Aggravated Assault and Arson.

The remaining 8 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Burglary, Incest, Motor Vehicle Theft and Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Davis Technical College: Criminal Offenses by year

Declining 33% (3 → 2 incidents)

1.522.533.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 3On-campus incidents, 2023: 3On-campus incidents, 2024: 2 3 2 ▼ -33.3%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 3
2023 3
2024 2
Crime Type 202420232022
Fondling 211
Aggravated Assault 011
Arson 011
Burglary 000
Incest 000
Motor Vehicle Theft 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 15
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 8
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Davis Technical College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

UT

Davis Technical College

0.48 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#323
Enrollment
4,188
Data year
2024

PA

Gannon University

1.19 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#732
Enrollment
4,189
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Davis Technical College sits on price and outcomes

See Utah's cost ranking

At $13,410, Davis Technical College's reported average net price is cheaper than 24% among 45 Utah colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,659.

$13,410
average net price
$18,659
Utah median

Median reported earnings six years after entry are $41,916, roughly 3.1 times a year of net price. That is a workable ratio, though it says nothing about how long the programme takes to finish. 58% complete within six years, so roughly 42% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$41,916
Median Earnings (10yr)
$41,734

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,145 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Closest by National Rank

Davis Technical College (national rank #323) sits near Central Texas College (#324) and Laramie County Community College (#322) on the scored national list, nearest by rank, not by size or state.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Davis Technical College, both outside UT so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Similar 2024 Clery rate (nationwide)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Davis Technical College safe?
Davis Technical College has a safety score of 0.48 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students) and ranks #323 nationally out of 2,072 ranked institutions - nearest similar-enrollment comparison: Gannon University (1.19/1k). Same-state same-level set: Ogden-Weber Technical College (0.48/1k); Mountainland Technical College (0.00/1k); Uintah Basin Technical College (0.50/1k); Bridgerland Technical College (0.00/1k); Dixie Technical College (0.00/1k); Southwest Technical College (2.31/1k); Tooele Technical College (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Salt Lake City (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Davis Technical College?
For calendar year 2024, Davis Technical College reported Fondling (2) in the Criminal Offenses section. Every other category in that section was reported at zero; other Clery tables are separate.
How does Davis Technical College compare to similar schools?
Davis Technical College reports 81% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Gannon University. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Gannon University (1.19/1k); Wentworth Institute of Technology (9.31/1k); Lindsey Wilson College (1.43/1k); Laramie County Community College (0.48/1k); Holyoke Community College (0.24/1k). Same-state same-level set: Ogden-Weber Technical College (0.48/1k); Mountainland Technical College (0.00/1k); Uintah Basin Technical College (0.50/1k); Bridgerland Technical College (0.00/1k); Dixie Technical College (0.00/1k); Southwest Technical College (2.31/1k); Tooele Technical College (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Salt Lake City (0.00/1k).
Does Davis Technical College have fire safety data?
Davis Technical College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.