OK
Tulsa, OK · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit
Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa
Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- 234
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 486567 · Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UNK State rank n/a
- PEER-FINISH Emmaus Bible College · ±0.00
- ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-NONE No incidents
- ENR-SMALL 234
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Emmaus Bible College (+0.00/1k)
Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Emmaus Bible College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Emmaus Bible College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around Paul Mitchell the
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Paul on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa · this campus · lowest 0
Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Prism Career Institute-West Atlantic · highest peer 0
Prism Career Institute-West Atlantic City — highest peer
0 per 1,000 students
- Emmaus Bible College · near 0
Emmaus Bible College — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Union Theological Seminary in · near 0
Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Paul Mitchell the School-Louisville · near 0
Paul Mitchell the School-Louisville — near
0 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 37 OK Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa is larger than 56% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Paul Mitchell the School-T…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yukon Beauty College Inc | 9 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 |
| Elite Beauty College | 10 | 0.00 | 3 | 3 |
| Academy of Cosmetology, Barbering, and Esthetics | 19 | 0.00 | 6 | 3 |
| Southern School of Beauty Inc | 21 | 0.00 | 8 | 3 |
| Formations Institute of Cosmetology & Barbering | 29 | 0.00 | 11 | 3 |
| Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy-Oklahoma | 29 | 0.00 | 11 | 3 |
| Hello Gorgeous Barbers Stillwater's School of Barbering | 31 | 0.00 | 17 | 3 |
| Ponca City Beauty College | 38 | 0.00 | 19 | 3 |
| Hair Arts Institute | 38 | 0.00 | 19 | 3 |
| Formations Institute | 39 | 0.00 | 25 | 3 |
| Durant Institute of Hair Design | 41 | 0.00 | 28 | 3 |
| Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa (this campus) | 234 | 0.00 | 56 | 3 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
Crime Statistics by Year
Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Emmaus Bible College.
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
9 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
IA
Emmaus Bible College
NY
Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York
Cost context
Where Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa sits on price and outcomes
At $20,840, Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa's reported average net price is cheaper than 82% among 84 Oklahoma colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $12,710.
- $20,840
- average net price
- $12,710
- Oklahoma median
- 2.0×
- six-year earnings to median debt
Median earnings six years after entry ($20,371) are less than one year of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 59% complete within six years, so roughly 41% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.
Academic & Financial Profile
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,239 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa safe?
What crimes are reported at Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa?
How does Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa compare to similar schools?
Does Paul Mitchell the School-Tulsa have fire safety data?
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.