Fort Cobb, OK · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Caddo Kiowa Technology Center

Caddo Kiowa Technology Center reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
358
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Caddo Kiowa Technology Center reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 364946 · Caddo Kiowa Technology Center 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Southeastern Esthetics Institute · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 358
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Southeastern Esthetics Institute (+0.00/1k)

Caddo Kiowa Technology Center sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Southeastern Esthetics Institute. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Southeastern Esthetics Institute (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Caddo Kiowa Technology Center reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Caddo Kiowa Technology

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Caddo on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Caddo Kiowa Technology Center's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Caddo Kiowa Technology Center was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 OK Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Caddo Kiowa Technology Center is larger than 69% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Caddo Kiowa Technology Cen…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Caddo Kiowa Technology Cen…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Yukon Beauty College Inc90.0003
Elite Beauty College100.0033
Academy of Cosmetology, Barbering, and Esthetics190.0063
Southern School of Beauty Inc210.0083
Formations Institute of Cosmetology & Barbering290.00113
Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy-Oklahoma290.00113
Hello Gorgeous Barbers Stillwater's School of Barbering310.00173
Ponca City Beauty College380.00193
Hair Arts Institute380.00193
Formations Institute390.00253
Durant Institute of Hair Design410.00283
Caddo Kiowa Technology Center (this campus)3580.00693

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Caddo Kiowa Technology Center has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: College of the Atlantic.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Caddo Kiowa Technology Center vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

OK

Caddo Kiowa Technology Center

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
358
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Caddo Kiowa Technology Center sits on price and outcomes

See Oklahoma's cost ranking

At $-28, Caddo Kiowa Technology Center's reported average net price is among the lowest reported prices among 84 Oklahoma colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $12,710.

$-28
average net price
$12,710
Oklahoma median

66% complete within six years, so roughly 34% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$28,039
Median Earnings (10yr)
$21,576

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,171 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Caddo Kiowa Technology Center safe?
Caddo Kiowa Technology Center has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 358 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is College of the Atlantic. Same-state same-level set: Pontotoc Technology Center (0.00/1k); Mid-Del Technology Center (0.00/1k); Southwest Technology Center (0.00/1k); Green Country Technology Center (0.00/1k); High Plains Technology Center (0.00/1k); Great Plains Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pioneer Technology Center (0.00/1k); Northwest Technology Center-Alva (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Caddo Kiowa Technology Center?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Caddo Kiowa Technology Center reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Caddo Kiowa Technology Center compare to similar schools?
Caddo Kiowa Technology Center reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than College of the Atlantic. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: College of the Atlantic (2.79/1k); Center for Advanced Studies On Puerto Rico and the Caribbean (2.79/1k); Southeastern Esthetics Institute (0.00/1k); Beulah Heights University (0.00/1k); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (164.35/1k). Same-state same-level set: Pontotoc Technology Center (0.00/1k); Mid-Del Technology Center (0.00/1k); Southwest Technology Center (0.00/1k); Green Country Technology Center (0.00/1k); High Plains Technology Center (0.00/1k); Great Plains Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pioneer Technology Center (0.00/1k); Northwest Technology Center-Alva (0.00/1k).
Does Caddo Kiowa Technology Center have fire safety data?
Caddo Kiowa Technology Center has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.