NJ
Mobile Technical Training
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
South Hackensack, NJ · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit
Mobile Technical Training
Mobile Technical Training reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- 31
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
Mobile Technical Training reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 490249 · Mobile Technical Training 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UNK State rank n/a
- PEER-FINISH Cosmetology Concepts Niles · ±0.00
- ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-NONE No incidents
- ENR-SMALL 31
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Cosmetology Concepts Niles (+0.00/1k)
Mobile Technical Training sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Cosmetology Concepts Niles. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Cosmetology Concepts Niles (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
Mobile Technical Training reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around Mobile Technical Training
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Mobile on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- Mobile Technical Training · this campus · lowest 0
Mobile Technical Training — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Cosmetology Concepts Niles · near 0
Cosmetology Concepts Niles — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Baldwin Beauty School-South Austin · near 0
Baldwin Beauty School-South Austin — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Wood County Technical Center-Practical · near 0
Wood County Technical Center-Practical Nursing — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Salem College of Hairstyling · highest peer
Salem College of Hairstyling — highest peer
32.26 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Mobile Technical Training's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
Mobile Technical Training was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 37 NJ Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Mobile Technical Training is larger than 3% and safer-reporting than 6% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Mobile Technical Training: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Community Career & Technical Institute | 11 | 0.00 | 0 | 6 |
| Mobile Technical Training (this campus) | 31 | 0.00 | 3 | 6 |
| Morris County Vocational School District | 36 | 0.00 | 6 | 6 |
| Center for the Healing Arts | 39 | 0.00 | 8 | 6 |
| PC AGE-Metropark | 46 | 0.00 | 11 | 6 |
| ASI Career Institute | 62 | 0.00 | 14 | 6 |
| MCVSD | 67 | 0.00 | 17 | 6 |
| Pro Beauty Academy | 67 | 0.00 | 17 | 6 |
| Artistic Academy of Hair Design | 88 | 0.00 | 22 | 6 |
| Union County Vocational Technical School | 88 | 0.00 | 22 | 6 |
| Cutting Edge Academy | 99 | 0.00 | 28 | 6 |
| Empire Beauty School-Union | 103 | 0.00 | 31 | 6 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
Crime Statistics by Year
Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Mobile Technical Training has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Cosmetology Concepts Niles.
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
9 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
Mobile Technical Training vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
IL
Cosmetology Concepts Niles
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
MO
Salem College of Hairstyling
32.26 incidents / 1,000 students
Cost context
Where Mobile Technical Training sits on price and outcomes
At $13,643, Mobile Technical Training's reported average net price is cheaper than 36% among 129 New Jersey colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,173.
- $13,643
- average net price
- $18,173
- New Jersey median
86% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. A completion rate describes the cohort, not an individual student's likelihood of finishing.
Academic & Financial Profile
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 563 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Cosmetology Concepts Niles
Niles, IL · 31 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Salem College of Hairstyling
Rolla, MO · 31 enrolled
Safety Score 32.26
Baldwin Beauty School-South Austin
Austin, TX · 31 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Wood County Technical Center-Practical Nursing
Parkersburg, WV · 31 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Delaware Chenango Madison Otsego BOCES-Practical Nursing Program
Norwich, NY · 31 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mobile Technical Training safe?
Mobile Technical Training has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 31 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Cosmetology Concepts Niles. Same-state same-level set: Morris County Vocational School District (0.00/1k); Center for the Healing Arts (0.00/1k); PC AGE-Metropark (0.00/1k); New Community Career & Technical Institute (0.00/1k); ASI Career Institute (0.00/1k); MCVSD (0.00/1k); Pro Beauty Academy (0.00/1k); Artistic Academy of Hair Design (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Mobile Technical Training?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Mobile Technical Training reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Mobile Technical Training compare to similar schools?
Mobile Technical Training reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Cosmetology Concepts Niles. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Cosmetology Concepts Niles (0.00/1k); Salem College of Hairstyling (32.26/1k); Baldwin Beauty School-South Austin (0.00/1k); Wood County Technical Center-Practical Nursing (0.00/1k); Delaware Chenango Madison Otsego BOCES-Practical Nursing Program (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Morris County Vocational School District (0.00/1k); Center for the Healing Arts (0.00/1k); PC AGE-Metropark (0.00/1k); New Community Career & Technical Institute (0.00/1k); ASI Career Institute (0.00/1k); MCVSD (0.00/1k); Pro Beauty Academy (0.00/1k); Artistic Academy of Hair Design (0.00/1k).
Does Mobile Technical Training have fire safety data?
Mobile Technical Training has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.