Springfield, MO · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
396
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 482097 · Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Carrington College-Las Vegas · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 396
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Carrington College-Las Vegas (+0.00/1k)

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Carrington College-Las Vegas. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Carrington College-Las Vegas (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Midwest on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MO Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri is larger than 100% and safer-reporting than 8% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Midwest Technical Institut…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Midwest Technical Institut…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Saline County Career Center230.0008
Lex La-Ray Technical Center250.0038
Carthage R9 School District-Carthage Technical Center260.0068
Concorde Career College-Broadway260.0068
Waynesville Career Center270.00118
Cass Career Center270.00118
Aesthetics Institute280.00178
Four Rivers Career Center300.00198
Salem College of Hairstyling3132.26220
Warrensburg Area Career Center310.00228
Academy of Beauty Professionals310.00228
Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri (this campus)3960.001008

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Carrington College-Las Vegas.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MO

Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
396
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri sits on price and outcomes

See Missouri's cost ranking

At $26,023, Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri's reported average net price is cheaper than 86% among 116 Missouri colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,613.

$26,023
average net price
$17,613
Missouri median
3.2×
six-year earnings to median debt
$8,720
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $23,911 for families reporting under $30,000 against $32,631 above $110,000, a difference of $8,720. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $26,023 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

Median earnings six years after entry ($30,633) are less than 1.2 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 76% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$30,633
Median Earnings (10yr)
$33,601
Loan Repayment (3yr)
31%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,153 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri safe?
Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 396 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Carrington College-Las Vegas. Same-state same-level set: Paul Mitchell the School-Springfield (0.00/1k); Academy of Hair Design-Springfield (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-St Louis (0.00/1k); Grabber School of Hair Design (10.99/1k); Applied Tech (0.00/1k); Summit Salon Academy Kansas City (0.00/1k); St Louis College of Health Careers-St Louis (0.00/1k); The Salon Professional Academy-St Charles (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri compare to similar schools?
Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Carrington College-Las Vegas. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Carrington College-Las Vegas (0.00/1k); Spartan College of Aeronautics and Technology (0.00/1k); Donnelly College (0.00/1k); Western Theological Seminary (2.52/1k); Professional Skills Institute (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Paul Mitchell the School-Springfield (0.00/1k); Academy of Hair Design-Springfield (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-St Louis (0.00/1k); Grabber School of Hair Design (10.99/1k); Applied Tech (0.00/1k); Summit Salon Academy Kansas City (0.00/1k); St Louis College of Health Careers-St Louis (0.00/1k); The Salon Professional Academy-St Charles (0.00/1k).
Does Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri have fire safety data?
Midwest Technical Institute-Missouri has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.