Sunset Hills, MO · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Applied Tech

Applied Tech reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
172
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Applied Tech reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 417716 · Applied Tech 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Empire Beauty School-Queens · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 172
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Empire Beauty School-Queens (+0.00/1k)

Applied Tech sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Empire Beauty School-Queens. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Empire Beauty School-Queens (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Applied Tech reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Applied Tech

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Applied on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Applied Tech's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Applied Tech was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MO Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Applied Tech is larger than 89% and safer-reporting than 8% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Applied Tech: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Applied Tech: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Kirksville Area Technical Center220.0008
Saline County Career Center230.0038
Lex La-Ray Technical Center250.0068
Carthage R9 School District-Carthage Technical Center260.0088
Concorde Career College-Broadway260.0088
Waynesville Career Center270.00148
Cass Career Center270.00148
Aesthetics Institute280.00198
Four Rivers Career Center300.00228
Salem College of Hairstyling3132.26250
Warrensburg Area Career Center310.00258
Applied Tech (this campus)1720.00898

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Applied Tech recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Empire Beauty School-Queens.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

18 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
18 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Applied Tech vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MO

Applied Tech

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
172
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Applied Tech sits on price and outcomes

See Missouri's cost ranking

At $23,405, Applied Tech's reported average net price is cheaper than 79% among 116 Missouri colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,613.

$23,405
average net price
$17,613
Missouri median
3.9×
six-year earnings to median debt

Six-year median earnings of $57,854 run about 2.5 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. Only 29% complete within six years. Most students here do not finish, which is the single most important number on this page for anyone weighing the cost.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
41%

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$57,854
Median Earnings (10yr)
$56,508

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,337 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Applied Tech safe?
Applied Tech has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 172 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Empire Beauty School-Queens. Same-state same-level set: Grabber School of Hair Design (10.99/1k); Summit Salon Academy Kansas City (0.00/1k); St Louis College of Health Careers-St Louis (0.00/1k); The Salon Professional Academy-St Charles (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-St Louis (0.00/1k); House of Heavilin Beauty College-Blue Springs (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Missouri Columbia (0.00/1k); Missouri College of Cosmetology and Esthetics (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Applied Tech?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Applied Tech reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Applied Tech compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Empire Beauty School-Queens at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in MO; same-state same-level scored peers include Grabber School of Hair Design (10.99/1k); Summit Salon Academy Kansas City (0.00/1k); St Louis College of Health Careers-St Louis (0.00/1k); The Salon Professional Academy-St Charles (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-St Louis (0.00/1k); House of Heavilin Beauty College-Blue Springs (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Missouri Columbia (0.00/1k); Missouri College of Cosmetology and Esthetics (0.00/1k).
Does Applied Tech have fire safety data?
Applied Tech has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.