Fort Myers, FL · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Lee Professional Institute

Lee Professional Institute reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
36
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Lee Professional Institute reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 484172 · Lee Professional Institute 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH University of Pittsburgh-Titusville · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 36
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: University of Pittsburgh-Titusville (+0.00/1k)

Lee Professional Institute sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer University of Pittsburgh-Titusville. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is University of Pittsburgh-Titusville (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Lee Professional Institute reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Lee Professional Institute

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Lee on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Lee Professional Institute's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Lee Professional Institute was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 FL Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Lee Professional Institute is larger than 36% and safer-reporting than 3% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Lee Professional Institute: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Lee Professional Institute: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Total Beauty Institute100.0003
National Personal Training Institute-Tampa150.0033
Center for Neurosomatic Studies160.0063
The Beauty Institute180.0083
Trendsetters School of Beauty & Barbering180.0083
Pets Playground Grooming School220.00143
Ruben's Five Star Academy220.00143
American Advanced Technicians Institute230.00193
Florida School of Massage250.00223
UR Beauty & Barber Academy260.00253
Fort Pierce Beauty Academy280.00283
Lee Professional Institute (this campus)360.00363

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Lee Professional Institute has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: University of Pittsburgh-Titusville.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Lee Professional Institute vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

FL

Lee Professional Institute

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
36
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Lee Professional Institute sits on price and outcomes

See Florida's cost ranking

At $15,799, Lee Professional Institute's reported average net price is cheaper than 40% among 263 Florida colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $19,849.

$15,799
average net price
$19,849
Florida median

Six-year median earnings of $27,426 run about 1.7 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. 87% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 663 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lee Professional Institute safe?
Lee Professional Institute has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 36 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is University of Pittsburgh-Titusville. Same-state same-level set: National Personal Training Institute (0.00/1k); World Class Academy of Beauty Careers (0.00/1k); KCK Beauty & Barber Academy (0.00/1k); JT's Cuts Academy (0.00/1k); Adrian H. Wallace Barber Academy (0.00/1k); HCA Florida Mercy Hospital School of Practical Nursing (32.26/1k); Bellasa Professional Institute (0.00/1k); Fort Pierce Beauty Academy (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Lee Professional Institute?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Lee Professional Institute reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Lee Professional Institute compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is University of Pittsburgh-Titusville at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in FL; same-state same-level scored peers include National Personal Training Institute (0.00/1k); World Class Academy of Beauty Careers (0.00/1k); KCK Beauty & Barber Academy (0.00/1k); JT's Cuts Academy (0.00/1k); Adrian H. Wallace Barber Academy (0.00/1k); HCA Florida Mercy Hospital School of Practical Nursing (32.26/1k); Bellasa Professional Institute (0.00/1k); Fort Pierce Beauty Academy (0.00/1k).
Does Lee Professional Institute have fire safety data?
Lee Professional Institute has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.