Clearwater, FL · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Center for Neurosomatic Studies

Center for Neurosomatic Studies reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
16
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Center for Neurosomatic Studies reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 488226 · Center for Neurosomatic Studies 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH National Conservatory of Dramatic · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 16
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: National Conservatory of Dramatic Arts (+0.00/1k)

Center for Neurosomatic Studies sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer National Conservatory of Dramatic Arts. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is National Conservatory of Dramatic Arts (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Center for Neurosomatic Studies reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Center for Neurosomatic

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Center on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Center for Neurosomatic Studies's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Center for Neurosomatic Studies was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 FL Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Center for Neurosomatic Studies is larger than 6% and safer-reporting than 3% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Center for Neurosomatic St…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Center for Neurosomatic St…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Total Beauty Institute100.0003
National Personal Training Institute-Tampa150.0033
Center for Neurosomatic Studies (this campus)160.0063
The Beauty Institute180.0083
Trendsetters School of Beauty & Barbering180.0083
Pets Playground Grooming School220.00143
Ruben's Five Star Academy220.00143
American Advanced Technicians Institute230.00193
Florida School of Massage250.00223
UR Beauty & Barber Academy260.00253
Fort Pierce Beauty Academy280.00283
HCA Florida Mercy Hospital School of Practical Nursing3132.26310

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Center for Neurosomatic Studies is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: National Conservatory of Dramatic Arts.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Center for Neurosomatic Studies vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

FL

Center for Neurosomatic Studies

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
16
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Center for Neurosomatic Studies sits on price and outcomes

See Florida's cost ranking

At $48,705, Center for Neurosomatic Studies's reported average net price is cheaper than 97% among 263 Florida colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $19,849.

$48,705
average net price
$19,849
Florida median

63% complete within six years, so roughly 37% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. A completion rate describes the cohort, not an individual student's likelihood of finishing.

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 239 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Center for Neurosomatic Studies safe?
Center for Neurosomatic Studies has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 16 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is National Conservatory of Dramatic Arts. Same-state same-level set: National Personal Training Institute-Tampa (0.00/1k); The Beauty Institute (0.00/1k); Trendsetters School of Beauty & Barbering (0.00/1k); Pets Playground Grooming School (0.00/1k); Total Beauty Institute (0.00/1k); Ruben's Five Star Academy (0.00/1k); American Advanced Technicians Institute (0.00/1k); Florida School of Massage (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Center for Neurosomatic Studies?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Center for Neurosomatic Studies reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Center for Neurosomatic Studies compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is National Conservatory of Dramatic Arts at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in FL; same-state same-level scored peers include National Personal Training Institute-Tampa (0.00/1k); The Beauty Institute (0.00/1k); Trendsetters School of Beauty & Barbering (0.00/1k); Pets Playground Grooming School (0.00/1k); Total Beauty Institute (0.00/1k); Ruben's Five Star Academy (0.00/1k); American Advanced Technicians Institute (0.00/1k); Florida School of Massage (0.00/1k).
Does Center for Neurosomatic Studies have fire safety data?
Center for Neurosomatic Studies has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.