Lake Forest, IL · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
196
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 146490 · Lake Forest Graduate School 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Salon Success Academy-Corona · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 196
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Salon Success Academy-Corona (+0.00/1k)

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Salon Success Academy-Corona. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Salon Success Academy-Corona (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Lake Forest Graduate

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Lake on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 IL 4-year peers in this comparison, Lake Forest Graduate School of Management is larger than 39% and safer-reporting than 22% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Lake Forest Graduate Schoo…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Lake Forest Graduate Schoo…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Midwest College of Oriental Medicine-Skokie300.00022
Meadville Theological School of Lombard College620.00322
Trinity College of Nursing & Health Sciences6546.1563
Lakeview College of Nursing660.00822
Bexley Hall Seabury Western Theological Seminary Federation, Inc.8012.50118
Spertus College890.001422
Telshe Yeshiva-Chicago910.001722
Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago1019.901911
Institute for Clinical Social Work1210.002222
Ambria College of Nursing1230.002522
McCormick Theological Seminary1250.002822
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management (this campus)1960.003922

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Salon Success Academy-Corona.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

IL

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
196
Data year
2024

MI

Dorsey College-Wayne

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
196
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,284 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lake Forest Graduate School of Management safe?
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 196 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Salon Success Academy-Corona. Same-state same-level set: Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences (0.00/1k); University of Saint Mary of the Lake (0.00/1k); Catholic Theological Union at Chicago (0.00/1k); Hebrew Theological College (0.00/1k); Chicago Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Pacific College of Health and Science (0.00/1k); St. John's College-Department of Nursing (75.76/1k); Saint Anthony College of Nursing (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Lake Forest Graduate School of Management?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Lake Forest Graduate School of Management reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Lake Forest Graduate School of Management compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Salon Success Academy-Corona at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in IL; same-state same-level scored peers include Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences (0.00/1k); University of Saint Mary of the Lake (0.00/1k); Catholic Theological Union at Chicago (0.00/1k); Hebrew Theological College (0.00/1k); Chicago Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Pacific College of Health and Science (0.00/1k); St. John's College-Department of Nursing (75.76/1k); Saint Anthony College of Nursing (0.00/1k).
Does Lake Forest Graduate School of Management have fire safety data?
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.