Chicago, IL · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Chicago Theological Seminary

Across 2022–2024, Chicago Theological Seminary reported 1 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, with no net change between the first and last filed year; largest filed category is Motor Vehicle Theft.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
215
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Chicago Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 144014 · Chicago Theological Seminary 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Hollywood Institute · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-LEAD Motor Vehicle Th…
  • ENR-SMALL 215
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Hollywood Institute (+0.00/1k)

Chicago Theological Seminary sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Hollywood Institute. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Hollywood Institute (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Chicago Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Chicago Theological Seminary

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Chicago on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Chicago Theological Seminary's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

-1 reported incidents

Chicago Theological Seminary decreased from 1 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 IL 4-year peers in this comparison, Chicago Theological Seminary is larger than 47% and safer-reporting than 22% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Chicago Theological Seminary: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Chicago Theological Seminary: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Midwest College of Oriental Medicine-Skokie300.00022
Meadville Theological School of Lombard College620.00322
Trinity College of Nursing & Health Sciences6546.1563
Lakeview College of Nursing660.00822
Bexley Hall Seabury Western Theological Seminary Federation, Inc.8012.50118
Spertus College890.001422
Telshe Yeshiva-Chicago910.001722
Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago1019.901911
Institute for Clinical Social Work1210.002222
Ambria College of Nursing1230.002522
McCormick Theological Seminary1250.002822
Chicago Theological Seminary (this campus)2150.004722

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What changed between 2023 and 2024

Reported on-campus incidents at Chicago Theological Seminary fell from 1 to 0 (-100%). The decrease shows up in Motor Vehicle Theft (1 to 0).

This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.

What actually gets reported at Chicago Theological Seminary

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Motor Vehicle Theft.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Burglary and Fondling. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Chicago Theological Seminary: Criminal Offenses by year

Stable

00.511.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 0On-campus incidents, 2023: 1On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 0 0 ▲ +0.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Motor Vehicle Theft 010
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Burglary 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Chicago Theological Seminary vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

IL

Chicago Theological Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
215
Data year
2024

FL

Hollywood Institute

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
215
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,266 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chicago Theological Seminary safe?
Chicago Theological Seminary has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 215 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute. Same-state same-level set: Catholic Theological Union at Chicago (0.00/1k); University of Saint Mary of the Lake (0.00/1k); Lake Forest Graduate School of Management (0.00/1k); Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences (0.00/1k); Pacific College of Health and Science (0.00/1k); Hebrew Theological College (0.00/1k); Saint Anthony College of Nursing (0.00/1k); Methodist College (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Chicago Theological Seminary?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Chicago Theological Seminary reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Chicago Theological Seminary compare to similar schools?
Chicago Theological Seminary reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute (13.95/1k); Hollywood Institute (0.00/1k); Medspa Academies-National Institute of Modern Aesthetics (0.00/1k); Concorde Career College-Garden Grove (0.00/1k); The Modern College of Design (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Catholic Theological Union at Chicago (0.00/1k); University of Saint Mary of the Lake (0.00/1k); Lake Forest Graduate School of Management (0.00/1k); Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences (0.00/1k); Pacific College of Health and Science (0.00/1k); Hebrew Theological College (0.00/1k); Saint Anthony College of Nursing (0.00/1k); Methodist College (0.00/1k).
Does Chicago Theological Seminary have fire safety data?
Chicago Theological Seminary has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.