Fort Wayne, IN · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#13
IN rank
2,779
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 492962 · Indiana Institute of Technology-College 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #13 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Nash Community College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 2,779
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Nash Community College (+0.00/1k)

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Nash Community College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Nash Community College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Indiana Institute of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Indiana on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 IN 4-year peers in this comparison, Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies is larger than 78% and safer-reporting than 67% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105017.635.252.870.3Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Indiana Institute of Techn…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Indiana Institute of Techn…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Union Bible College2180.00067
Marian University-Ancilla2304.35328
Concordia Theological Seminary2790.00667
Mid-America College of Funeral Service2790.00667
Oakland City University6400.001167
Calumet College of Saint Joseph6581.521444
Holy Cross College6610.001767
John Patrick University of Health and Applied Sciences6740.001967
Earlham College75310.62223
Goshen College8478.262511
Wabash College8660.002867
Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies (this campus)2,7790.007867

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Meridian Community College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

IN

Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
2,779
Data year
2024

NC

Nash Community College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
2,780
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies sits on price and outcomes

See Indiana's cost ranking

At $20,473, Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies's reported average net price is cheaper than 57% among 94 Indiana colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $19,463.

$20,473
average net price
$19,463
Indiana median
1.1×
six-year earnings to median debt
$4,522
reported income-bracket spread

Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $20,035 and those above $110,000 report $24,557, a difference of just $4,522. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.

Median earnings six years after entry ($29,717) are less than 1.5 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$9,896
Out-of-State Tuition
$9,896
Avg Net Price
$20,473
Median Debt
$26,391
Pell Grant Recipients
55%
How does this cost rank in IN? →

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
28%
Retention Rate
55%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$29,717
Median Earnings (10yr)
$47,327
Loan Repayment (3yr)
49%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,268 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies, both outside IN so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies safe?
Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Indiana Institute of Technology (5.42/1k); Indiana University-Kokomo (1.37/1k); Valparaiso University (3.88/1k); Taylor University (0.78/1k); Indiana University-Northwest (0.33/1k); Indiana University-East (0.00/1k); Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (0.00/1k); Grace College and Theological Seminary (0.43/1k).
What crimes are reported at Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies compare to similar schools?
Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Meridian Community College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Meridian Community College (2.88/1k); Nash Community College (0.00/1k); Rivier University (0.72/1k); Lafayette College (7.93/1k); East Central Community College (1.80/1k). Same-state same-level set: Indiana Institute of Technology (5.42/1k); Indiana University-Kokomo (1.37/1k); Valparaiso University (3.88/1k); Taylor University (0.78/1k); Indiana University-Northwest (0.33/1k); Indiana University-East (0.00/1k); Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (0.00/1k); Grace College and Theological Seminary (0.43/1k).
Does Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies have fire safety data?
Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.