IN
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Terre Haute, IN · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Across 2022–2024, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology reported 3 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count fell over that span (largest filed category: Fondling). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: Grace College and Theological Seminary.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- #6
- IN rank
- 2,334
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 152318 · Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UPPER #6 in state
- PEER-FINISH Minnesota State College Southeast · ±0.00
- ZERO-FILED Zero filed
- TREND-DOWN ↓ 100%
- CAT-LEAD Fondling
- ENR-SMALL 2,334
- FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed
Nearest enrollment peer: Minnesota State College Southeast (+0.00/1k)
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Minnesota State College Southeast. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Minnesota State College Southeast (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around Rose-Hulman Institute of
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Rose-Hulman on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology · this campus · lowest 0
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Minnesota State College Southeast · near 0
Minnesota State College Southeast — near
0 per 1,000 students
- State Technical College of · near 0
State Technical College of Missouri — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Clovis Community College · near 0.43
Clovis Community College — near
0.43 per 1,000 students
- Otterbein University · highest peer
Otterbein University — highest peer
4.72 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology decreased from 1 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 37 IN 4-year peers in this comparison, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology is larger than 75% and safer-reporting than 61% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
- Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
- Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
- Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
- Rose-Hulman Institute of T…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Theological Seminary | 151 | 0.00 | 0 | 61 |
| Saint Meinrad School of Theology | 183 | 0.00 | 3 | 61 |
| Martin University | 198 | 5.05 | 6 | 22 |
| Union Bible College | 218 | 0.00 | 8 | 61 |
| Marian University-Ancilla | 230 | 4.35 | 11 | 25 |
| Concordia Theological Seminary | 279 | 0.00 | 14 | 61 |
| Mid-America College of Funeral Service | 279 | 0.00 | 14 | 61 |
| Oakland City University | 640 | 0.00 | 19 | 61 |
| Calumet College of Saint Joseph | 658 | 1.52 | 22 | 39 |
| Holy Cross College | 661 | 0.00 | 25 | 61 |
| John Patrick University of Health and Applied Sciences | 674 | 0.00 | 28 | 61 |
| Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (this campus) | 2,334 | 0.00 | 75 | 61 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
What changed between 2023 and 2024
Reported on-campus incidents at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology fell from 1 to 0 (-100%). The decrease shows up in Rape (1 to 0).
This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.
What actually gets reported at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Across 3 reporting years, on-campus incidents were recorded in 2 Clery Act categories here: Fondling and Rape. Fondling accounts for most of them.
The remaining 9 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Burglary and Incest. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.
Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.
Crime Statistics by Year
11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus onlyRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: Criminal Offenses by year
Declining 100% (2 → 0 incidents)
Read the chart as text
| Period | On-campus incidents |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| Crime Type | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fondling | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Rape | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Aggravated Assault | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arson | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Burglary | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Incest | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Motor Vehicle Theft | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Negligent Manslaughter | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robbery | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Statutory Rape | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate
Fire Safety
| Year | Fires | Inj. | Deaths | Cat I | Cat II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
18 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
OH
Otterbein University
4.72 incidents / 1,000 students
TX
University of North Texas Health Science Center
0.86 incidents / 1,000 students
Cost context
Where Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology sits on price and outcomes
At $42,513, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology's reported average net price is cheaper than 99% among 94 Indiana colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $19,463.
- $42,513
- average net price
- $19,463
- Indiana median
- 3.4×
- six-year earnings to median debt
- $9,151
- reported income-bracket spread
Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $36,843 and those above $110,000 report $45,994, a difference of just $9,151. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.
Six-year median earnings of $85,935 run about 2.0 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.
Academic & Financial Profile
Tuition & Costs
- In-State Tuition
- $58,649
- Out-of-State Tuition
- $58,649
- Avg Net Price
- $42,513
- Median Debt
- $25,000
- Pell Grant Recipients
- 12%
Admissions
- Acceptance Rate
- 77%
- SAT Average
- 1427
- SAT Math Range
- 670-770
- ACT Average
- 31
- ACT Range
- 29-34
Outcomes
- 4-Year Graduation Rate
- 80%
- Retention Rate
- 92%
- Median Earnings (6yr)
- $85,935
- Median Earnings (10yr)
- $101,253
- Loan Repayment (3yr)
- 97%
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,293 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Otterbein University
Westerville, OH · 2,332 enrolled
Safety Score 4.72
University of North Texas Health Science Center
Fort Worth, TX · 2,332 enrolled
Safety Score 0.86
Minnesota State College Southeast
Winona, MN · 2,331 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Clovis Community College
Clovis, NM · 2,342 enrolled
Safety Score 0.43
State Technical College of Missouri
Linn, MO · 2,346 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate
Two Clery-derived peer sets for Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, both outside IN so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).
Similar enrollment (nationwide)
Otterbein University
Westerville, OH · 2,332 enrolled
Safety score 4.72
University of North Texas Health Science Center
Fort Worth, TX · 2,332 enrolled
Safety score 0.86
New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary
New Orleans, LA · 2,349 enrolled
Safety score 0.43
John Brown University
Siloam Springs, AR · 2,350 enrolled
Safety score 1.70
San Joaquin Valley College-Visalia
Visalia, CA · 2,318 enrolled
Safety score 0.00
Thomas More University
Crestview Hills, KY · 2,350 enrolled
Safety score 0.43
University of Lynchburg
Lynchburg, VA · 2,316 enrolled
Safety score 7.34
Dickinson College
Carlisle, PA · 2,314 enrolled
Safety score 17.29
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology safe?
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Grace College and Theological Seminary (0.43/1k); Indiana Wesleyan University-Marion (1.36/1k); Taylor University (0.78/1k); University of Evansville (6.62/1k); Valparaiso University (3.88/1k); DePauw University (3.13/1k); Indiana Institute of Technology (5.42/1k); Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology compare to similar schools?
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Otterbein University. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Otterbein University (4.72/1k); University of North Texas Health Science Center (0.86/1k); Minnesota State College Southeast (0.00/1k); Clovis Community College (0.43/1k); State Technical College of Missouri (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Grace College and Theological Seminary (0.43/1k); Indiana Wesleyan University-Marion (1.36/1k); Taylor University (0.78/1k); University of Evansville (6.62/1k); Valparaiso University (3.88/1k); DePauw University (3.13/1k); Indiana Institute of Technology (5.42/1k); Indiana Institute of Technology-College of Professional Studies (0.00/1k).
Does Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology have fire safety data?
Yes. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.