St. Louis Park, MN · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Herzing University-Minneapolis

Herzing University-Minneapolis reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#7
MN rank
748
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Herzing University-Minneapolis reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 174154 · Herzing University-Minneapolis 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UPPER #7 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Tennessee College of Applied · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 748
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown (+0.00/1k)

Herzing University-Minneapolis sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Herzing University-Minneapolis reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Herzing University-Minneapolis

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Herzing on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Herzing University-Minneapolis's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Herzing University-Minneapolis was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MN 4-year peers in this comparison, Herzing University-Minneapolis is larger than 22% and safer-reporting than 69% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105018.136.254.372.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Herzing University-Minneap…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Herzing University-Minneap…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
American Academy of Health and Wellness290.00069
Academy College560.00369
Oak Hills Christian College950.00669
Hazelden Betty Ford Graduate School1920.00869
United Theological Seminary of the Twin Cities2260.001169
Adler Graduate School2750.001469
Luther Seminary3710.001769
University of Minnesota-Rochester5786.921919
Herzing University-Minneapolis (this campus)7480.002269
Minneapolis College of Art and Design8317.222514
North Central University85228.17283
Martin Luther College87811.39318

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Herzing University-Minneapolis is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Herzing University-Minneapolis vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MN

Herzing University-Minneapolis

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
748
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Herzing University-Minneapolis sits on price and outcomes

See Minnesota's cost ranking

At $16,670, Herzing University-Minneapolis's reported average net price is cheaper than 48% among 80 Minnesota colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $16,863.

$16,670
average net price
$16,863
Minnesota median
1.6×
six-year earnings to median debt
$9,043
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $15,304 for families reporting under $30,000 against $24,347 above $110,000, a difference of $9,043. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $16,670 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

Six-year median earnings of $35,295 run about 2.1 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$13,450
Out-of-State Tuition
$13,450
Avg Net Price
$16,670
Median Debt
$21,500
Pell Grant Recipients
57%
How does this cost rank in MN? →

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
94%

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
61%
Retention Rate
70%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$35,295
Median Earnings (10yr)
$36,909
Loan Repayment (3yr)
45%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,178 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Herzing University-Minneapolis, both outside MN so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Herzing University-Minneapolis safe?
Herzing University-Minneapolis has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Minneapolis College of Art and Design (7.22/1k); North Central University (28.17/1k); Martin Luther College (11.39/1k); Bethany Lutheran College (3.34/1k); University of Minnesota-Rochester (6.92/1k); University of Minnesota-Morris (2.04/1k); Northwestern Health Sciences University (0.00/1k); Luther Seminary (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Herzing University-Minneapolis?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Herzing University-Minneapolis reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Herzing University-Minneapolis compare to similar schools?
Herzing University-Minneapolis reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown (0.00/1k); Northwestern Technological Institute (0.00/1k); Southern Careers Institute-Austin (0.00/1k); Atlantis University (0.00/1k); University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus (2.68/1k). Same-state same-level set: Minneapolis College of Art and Design (7.22/1k); North Central University (28.17/1k); Martin Luther College (11.39/1k); Bethany Lutheran College (3.34/1k); University of Minnesota-Rochester (6.92/1k); University of Minnesota-Morris (2.04/1k); Northwestern Health Sciences University (0.00/1k); Luther Seminary (0.00/1k).
Does Herzing University-Minneapolis have fire safety data?
Herzing University-Minneapolis has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.