Rancho Cordova, CA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Chamberlain University-California

Chamberlain University-California reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#84
CA rank
751
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Chamberlain University-California reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 489353 · Chamberlain University-California 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #84 in state
  • PEER-FINISH South University-Tampa · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 751
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: South University-Tampa (+0.00/1k)

Chamberlain University-California sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer South University-Tampa. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is South University-Tampa (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Chamberlain University-California reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Chamberlain University-California

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Chamberlain on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Chamberlain University-California's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Chamberlain University-California was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CA 4-year peers in this comparison, Chamberlain University-California is larger than 58% and safer-reporting than 39% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Chamberlain University-Cal…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Chamberlain University-Cal…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Southern California Institute of Technology5100.00039
World Mission University5100.00039
The Wright Institute5180.00639
The Chicago School at Anaheim5230.00839
Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey5260.001139
Gnomon5260.001139
InterCoast Colleges-West Covina5350.001739
West Coast University-Center for Graduate Studies5485.471911
Thomas Aquinas College5665.302214
Platt College-Los Angeles5700.002539
California University of Science and Medicine5900.002839
Chamberlain University-California (this campus)7510.005839

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Chamberlain University-California recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Fort Hays State University-Northwest Kansas Technical College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

18 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
18 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Chamberlain University-California vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CA

Chamberlain University-California

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
751
Data year
2024

FL

South University-Tampa

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
752
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Chamberlain University-California sits on price and outcomes

See California's cost ranking

At $36,559, Chamberlain University-California's reported average net price is cheaper than 90% among 492 California colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $20,161.

$36,559
average net price
$20,161
California median
4.0×
six-year earnings to median debt
$1,345
reported income-bracket spread

Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $35,887 and those above $110,000 report $37,232, a difference of just $1,345. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.

Six-year median earnings of $84,533 run about 2.3 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$21,271
Out-of-State Tuition
$21,271
Avg Net Price
$36,559
Median Debt
$20,919
Pell Grant Recipients
33%
How does this cost rank in CA? →

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
80%

Outcomes

Retention Rate
100%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$84,533
Median Earnings (10yr)
$92,405
Loan Repayment (3yr)
66%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,178 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Chamberlain University-California, both outside CA so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chamberlain University-California safe?
Chamberlain University-California has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Casa Loma College-Los Angeles (1.32/1k); Laguna College of Art and Design (0.00/1k); Pacific College of Health and Science (0.00/1k); Whittier College (5.03/1k); Humphreys University-Stockton and Modesto Campuses (0.00/1k); Menlo College (1.23/1k); Musicians Institute (0.00/1k); Pacifica Graduate Institute (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Chamberlain University-California?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Chamberlain University-California reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Chamberlain University-California compare to similar schools?
Chamberlain University-California reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Fort Hays State University-Northwest Kansas Technical College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Fort Hays State University-Northwest Kansas Technical College (7.98/1k); South University-Tampa (0.00/1k); Earlham College (10.62/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown (0.00/1k); Herzing University-Minneapolis (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Casa Loma College-Los Angeles (1.32/1k); Laguna College of Art and Design (0.00/1k); Pacific College of Health and Science (0.00/1k); Whittier College (5.03/1k); Humphreys University-Stockton and Modesto Campuses (0.00/1k); Menlo College (1.23/1k); Musicians Institute (0.00/1k); Pacifica Graduate Institute (0.00/1k).
Does Chamberlain University-California have fire safety data?
Chamberlain University-California has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.