Drumright, OK · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Central Technology Center

Across 2022–2024, Central Technology Center reported 3 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count rose over that span (largest filed category: Burglary). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: Mid-America Technology Center.

0.86
Incidents / 1k students
#562
Rank of 2,072
#31
OK rank
1,159
Enrolled students

0.86 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Central Technology Center reports 0.86 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 - 62% below Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College. Similar-enrollment scored peers: Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College (0.00/1k); United Education Institute-Morrow (1.72/1k); Aquinas College (4.32/1k); King University (5.19/1k); Galen Health Institutes-Austin Campus (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set also includes Mid-America Technology Center (0.00/1k); Northeast Technology Center (0.00/1k); Southern Oklahoma Technology Center (0.00/1k); Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center (0.00/1k); Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester (0.00/1k); Western Technology Center (0.00/1k); Red River Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pioneer Technology Center (0.00/1k). Largest Criminal Offenses total across filed years: Burglary.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.86
of 2,072 ranked nationally
#562
safer than ranked campuses its size
73%
Criminal Offenses, 2024
1
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 246017 · Central Technology Center 0.86/1k score rate · #562/2,072

RATE-QUIET · RANK-MID · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-NONE · TREND-UP · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-QUIET 0.86/1k
  • RANK-MID #562/2,072
  • ST-MID #31 in state
  • BELOW-PEER United Education Institute-Morrow · 0.86 back
  • ZERO-NONE Scored
  • TREND-UP ↑ trend
  • CAT-LEAD Burglary
  • ENR-SMALL 1,159
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: United Education Institute-Morrow (+0.86/1k)

Central Technology Center sheet RATE-QUIET · RANK-MID · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-NONE · TREND-UP · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer United Education Institute-Morrow. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-QUIET · RANK-MID · ST-MID · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-NONE · TREND-UP · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is United Education Institute-Morrow (+0.86/1k). National rank #562 of 2,072 scored campuses. Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Central Technology Center reports 0.86 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 - 62% below Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College. Similar-enrollment scored peers: Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College (0.00/1k); United Education Institute-Morrow (1.72/1k); Aquinas College (4.32/1k); King University (5.19/1k); Galen Health Institutes-Austin Campus (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set also includes Mid-America Technology Center (0.00/1k); Northeast Technology Center (0.00/1k); Southern Oklahoma Technology Center (0.00/1k); Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center (0.00/1k); Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester (0.00/1k); Western Technology Center (0.00/1k); Red River Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pioneer Technology Center (0.00/1k). Largest Criminal Offenses total across filed years: Burglary.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Central Technology Center

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Central on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Central Technology Center's 0.86/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

-1 reported incidents

Central Technology Center decreased from 2 to 1 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 OK Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Central Technology Center is larger than 97% and safer-reporting than 0% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Central Technology Center: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Central Technology Center: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Elite Beauty College100.0003
Academy of Cosmetology, Barbering, and Esthetics190.0033
Southern School of Beauty Inc210.0063
Formations Institute of Cosmetology & Barbering290.0083
Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy-Oklahoma290.0083
Hello Gorgeous Barbers Stillwater's School of Barbering310.00143
Ponca City Beauty College380.00173
Hair Arts Institute380.00173
Formations Institute390.00223
Durant Institute of Hair Design410.00253
Premier Academy of Cosmetology490.00283
Central Technology Center (this campus)1,1590.86970

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What changed between 2023 and 2024

Reported on-campus incidents at Central Technology Center fell from 2 to 1 (-50%). The decrease shows up in Burglary (2 to 1).

This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.

What actually gets reported at Central Technology Center

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Burglary.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Fondling and Incest. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Central Technology Center: Criminal Offenses by year

Rising

0123 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 0On-campus incidents, 2023: 2On-campus incidents, 2024: 1 0 1 ▲ +0.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
Crime Type 202420232022
Burglary 120
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Motor Vehicle Theft 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

18 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
18 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 1
Drugs 2023 0 1
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Central Technology Center vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

OK

Central Technology Center

0.86 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#562
Enrollment
1,159
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Central Technology Center sits on price and outcomes

See Oklahoma's cost ranking

At $2,674, Central Technology Center's reported average net price is among the lowest reported prices among 84 Oklahoma colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $12,710.

$2,674
average net price
$12,710
Oklahoma median

Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $31,051 - about 11.6 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. 89% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$31,051
Median Earnings (10yr)
$36,351

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,268 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Closest by National Rank

Central Technology Center (national rank #562) sits near A T Still University of Health Sciences (#563) and Western Dakota Technical College (#561) on the scored national list, nearest by rank, not by size or state.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Central Technology Center, both outside OK so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Similar 2024 Clery rate (nationwide)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Central Technology Center safe?
Central Technology Center has a safety score of 0.86 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students) and ranks #562 nationally out of 2,072 ranked institutions - nearest similar-enrollment comparison: Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Mid-America Technology Center (0.00/1k); Northeast Technology Center (0.00/1k); Southern Oklahoma Technology Center (0.00/1k); Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center (0.00/1k); Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester (0.00/1k); Western Technology Center (0.00/1k); Red River Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pioneer Technology Center (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Central Technology Center?
For calendar year 2024, Central Technology Center reported Burglary (1) in the Criminal Offenses section. Every other category in that section was reported at zero; other Clery tables are separate.
How does Central Technology Center compare to similar schools?
Central Technology Center reports 62% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College (0.00/1k); United Education Institute-Morrow (1.72/1k); Aquinas College (4.32/1k); King University (5.19/1k); Galen Health Institutes-Austin Campus (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Mid-America Technology Center (0.00/1k); Northeast Technology Center (0.00/1k); Southern Oklahoma Technology Center (0.00/1k); Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center (0.00/1k); Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester (0.00/1k); Western Technology Center (0.00/1k); Red River Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pioneer Technology Center (0.00/1k).
Does Central Technology Center have fire safety data?
Central Technology Center has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.