Brooklyn, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
15
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 488004 · Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 15
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford (+0.00/1k)

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Central Yeshiva Beth

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Central on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY 4-year peers in this comparison, Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph is larger than 0% and safer-reporting than 3% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph (this campus)150.0003
Talmudical Institute of Upstate New York170.0033
Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael230.0063
Mesivta of Eastern Parkway-Yeshiva Zichron Meilech390.0083
Yeshiva Zichron Aryeh410.00113
Bais Binyomin Academy460.00143
Yeshiva Ohr Naftoli490.00173
Bais Medrash of Dexter Park510.00193
Rabbinical College Beth Shraga530.00223
Bais Medrash Elyon610.00253
Yeshiva of Ocean630.00283
Yeshivat Hechal Shemuel650.00313

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
15
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$10,000
Out-of-State Tuition
$10,000
Pell Grant Recipients
27%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 197 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph safe?
Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 15 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford. Same-state same-level set: Talmudical Institute of Upstate New York (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael (0.00/1k); Mesivta of Eastern Parkway-Yeshiva Zichron Meilech (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Zichron Aryeh (0.00/1k); Bais Binyomin Academy (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Ohr Naftoli (0.00/1k); Bais Medrash of Dexter Park (0.00/1k); Rabbinical College Beth Shraga (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in NY; same-state same-level scored peers include Talmudical Institute of Upstate New York (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Ohr Yisrael (0.00/1k); Mesivta of Eastern Parkway-Yeshiva Zichron Meilech (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Zichron Aryeh (0.00/1k); Bais Binyomin Academy (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Ohr Naftoli (0.00/1k); Bais Medrash of Dexter Park (0.00/1k); Rabbinical College Beth Shraga (0.00/1k).
Does Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph have fire safety data?
Central Yeshiva Beth Joseph has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.