Mexico, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation

Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
15
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 364964 · Center for Instruction, Technology 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 15
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford (+0.00/1k)

Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Center for Instruction,

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Center on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation is larger than 8% and safer-reporting than 6% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting025.550.976.4101.8013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Center for Instruction, Te…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Center for Instruction, Te…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Alliance Computing Solutions70.0006
Eastern Suffolk BOCES90.0036
Marion S Whelan School of Nursing of Geneva General Hospital140.0066
Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation (this campus)150.0086
Barber & Beauty Institute of New York160.00116
Leon Studio One School of Beauty Knowledge220.00146
Jefferson Lewis BOCES-Practical Nursing Program230.00176
Erie 2 Chautauqua Cattaraugus BOCES-Practical Nursing Program240.00196
New York Institute of Massage Inc300.00226
Orleans Niagara BOCES-Practical Nursing Program300.00226
Delaware Chenango Madison Otsego BOCES-Practical Nursing Program310.00286
Clinton Essex Warren Washington BOCES3164.52280

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
15
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation sits on price and outcomes

See New York's cost ranking

At $13,850, Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation's reported average net price is cheaper than 37% among 326 New York colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,940.

$13,850
average net price
$17,940
New York median
4.6×
six-year earnings to median debt
$6,539
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $13,393 for families reporting under $30,000 against $19,932 above $110,000, a difference of $6,539. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $13,850 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

Median reported earnings six years after entry are $35,225, roughly 2.5 times a year of net price. That is a workable ratio, though it says nothing about how long the programme takes to finish. 67% complete within six years, so roughly 33% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 197 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation safe?
Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 15 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford. Same-state same-level set: Marion S Whelan School of Nursing of Geneva General Hospital (0.00/1k); Barber & Beauty Institute of New York (0.00/1k); Eastern Suffolk BOCES (0.00/1k); Leon Studio One School of Beauty Knowledge (0.00/1k); Jefferson Lewis BOCES-Practical Nursing Program (0.00/1k); Alliance Computing Solutions (0.00/1k); Erie 2 Chautauqua Cattaraugus BOCES-Practical Nursing Program (0.00/1k); New York Institute of Massage Inc (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in NY; same-state same-level scored peers include Marion S Whelan School of Nursing of Geneva General Hospital (0.00/1k); Barber & Beauty Institute of New York (0.00/1k); Eastern Suffolk BOCES (0.00/1k); Leon Studio One School of Beauty Knowledge (0.00/1k); Jefferson Lewis BOCES-Practical Nursing Program (0.00/1k); Alliance Computing Solutions (0.00/1k); Erie 2 Chautauqua Cattaraugus BOCES-Practical Nursing Program (0.00/1k); New York Institute of Massage Inc (0.00/1k).
Does Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation have fire safety data?
Center for Instruction, Technology & Innovation has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.