Los Angeles, CA · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
166
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 401250 · Yo San University of 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Iliff School of Theology · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 166
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Iliff School of Theology (+0.00/1k)

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Iliff School of Theology. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Iliff School of Theology (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Yo San University

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Yo on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CA 4-year peers in this comparison, Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine is larger than 72% and safer-reporting than 11% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Yo San University of Tradi…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Yo San University of Tradi…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Franciscan School of Theology89269.6600
Design Institute of San Diego940.00311
San Diego Christian College960.00611
Epic Bible College & Graduate School980.00811
High Tech High Graduate School of Education990.001111
Pacific States University1010.001411
Interior Designers Institute1020.001711
Dongguk University Los Angeles1020.001711
Berkeley School of Theology10818.52223
Westminster Theological Seminary in California1080.002211
Latin American Bible Institute1120.002811
Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (this campus)1660.007211

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Iliff School of Theology.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CA

Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
166
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,337 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine safe?
Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 166 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Iliff School of Theology. Same-state same-level set: Providence Christian College (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary (0.00/1k); Southern California Seminary (0.00/1k); Fremont University (0.00/1k); Homestead Schools (0.00/1k); San Joaquin College of Law (0.00/1k); Graduate Theological Union (0.00/1k); PCI College (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine compare to similar schools?
Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Iliff School of Theology. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Iliff School of Theology (0.00/1k); Orange Technical College (6.02/1k); John A Gupton College (0.00/1k); Schuyler Steuben Chemung Tioga Allegany BOCES (0.00/1k); Empire Beauty School-Speedway (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Providence Christian College (0.00/1k); Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon Chabad West Coast Talmudical Seminary (0.00/1k); Southern California Seminary (0.00/1k); Fremont University (0.00/1k); Homestead Schools (0.00/1k); San Joaquin College of Law (0.00/1k); Graduate Theological Union (0.00/1k); PCI College (0.00/1k).
Does Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine have fire safety data?
Yo San University of Traditional Chinese Medicine has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.