Brooklyn, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg

Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
98
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 498906 · Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH California Hair Design Academy · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 98
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: California Hair Design Academy (+0.00/1k)

Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer California Hair Design Academy. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is California Hair Design Academy (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Yeshivas on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY 4-year peers in this comparison, Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg is larger than 53% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Yeshiva Zichron Aryeh410.0003
Bais Binyomin Academy460.0033
Yeshiva Ohr Naftoli490.0063
Bais Medrash of Dexter Park510.0083
Rabbinical College Beth Shraga530.00113
Bais Medrash Elyon610.00143
Yeshiva of Ocean630.00173
Yeshivat Hechal Shemuel650.00193
Mesivtha Tifereth Jerusalem of America720.00223
Yeshiva of the Telshe Alumni730.00253
Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School780.00283
Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg (this campus)980.00533

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: California Hair Design Academy.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
98
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg sits on price and outcomes

See New York's cost ranking

At $10,071, Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg's reported average net price is cheaper than 21% among 326 New York colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,940.

$10,071
average net price
$17,940
New York median

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$14,000
Out-of-State Tuition
$14,000
Avg Net Price
$10,071
Pell Grant Recipients
79%
How does this cost rank in NY? →

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
29%
Retention Rate
100%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,291 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg safe?
Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 98 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is California Hair Design Academy. Same-state same-level set: Ohr Hameir Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Beth Hamedrash Shaarei Yosher Institute (0.00/1k); Saint Vladimirs Orthodox Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Webb Institute (9.43/1k); New York Academy of Art (0.00/1k); DeVry College of New York (0.00/1k); Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah (0.00/1k); Yeshiva of Far Rockaway Derech Ayson Rabbinical Seminary (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is California Hair Design Academy at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in NY; same-state same-level scored peers include Ohr Hameir Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Beth Hamedrash Shaarei Yosher Institute (0.00/1k); Saint Vladimirs Orthodox Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Webb Institute (9.43/1k); New York Academy of Art (0.00/1k); DeVry College of New York (0.00/1k); Yeshivath Shaar Hatorah (0.00/1k); Yeshiva of Far Rockaway Derech Ayson Rabbinical Seminary (0.00/1k).
Does Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg have fire safety data?
Yes. Yeshivas Sanz Klauzenburg reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.