Brooklyn, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer

Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
499
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 491057 · Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Hannibal-LaGrange University · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 499
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Hannibal-LaGrange University (+0.00/1k)

Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Hannibal-LaGrange University. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Hannibal-LaGrange University (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Yeshiva on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY 4-year peers in this comparison, Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer is larger than 53% and safer-reporting than 11% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth El…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth El…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Northeastern Seminary21850.4600
Yeshiva Yesoda Hatorah Vetz Chaim2230.00311
Yeshiva Gedolah Imrei Yosef D'spinka2260.00611
Beth Medrash Meor Yitzchok2260.00611
Rabbinical College of Ohr Shimon Yisroel2320.001111
Union Theological Seminary in the City of New York2340.001411
Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion2404.17178
Yeshivath Zichron Moshe2430.001911
Bryant & Stratton College-Albany2490.002211
Associated Beth Rivkah Schools2540.002511
Rabbinical Academy Mesivta Rabbi Chaim Berlin2640.002811
Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer (this campus)4990.005311

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Hannibal-LaGrange University.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
499
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$12,300
Out-of-State Tuition
$12,300
Pell Grant Recipients
93%

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
74%

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
34%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,132 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer safe?
Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 499 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Hannibal-LaGrange University. Same-state same-level set: Yeshiva of Machzikai Hadas (0.00/1k); Boricua College (0.00/1k); Bryant & Stratton College-Syracuse North (0.00/1k); Rabbinical College Bobover Yeshiva Bnei Zion (0.00/1k); Northeast College of Health Sciences (0.00/1k); New York School of Interior Design (0.00/1k); Mesivta Torah Vodaath Rabbinical Seminary (0.00/1k); SUNY College of Optometry (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer compare to similar schools?
Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Hannibal-LaGrange University. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Hannibal-LaGrange University (0.00/1k); Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-Ft Worth (0.00/1k); Platt College-Ontario (0.00/1k); Fortis College-Cincinnati (0.00/1k); Lamson Institute (12.05/1k). Same-state same-level set: Yeshiva of Machzikai Hadas (0.00/1k); Boricua College (0.00/1k); Bryant & Stratton College-Syracuse North (0.00/1k); Rabbinical College Bobover Yeshiva Bnei Zion (0.00/1k); Northeast College of Health Sciences (0.00/1k); New York School of Interior Design (0.00/1k); Mesivta Torah Vodaath Rabbinical Seminary (0.00/1k); SUNY College of Optometry (0.00/1k).
Does Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer have fire safety data?
Yes. Yeshiva Kollel Tifereth Elizer reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.