Monroe, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#52
NY rank
2,957
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 446604 · Uta Mesivta of Kiryas 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #52 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Mount Aloysius College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 2,957
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Mount Aloysius College (+0.00/1k)

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Mount Aloysius College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Mount Aloysius College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Uta Mesivta of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Uta on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY 4-year peers in this comparison, Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel is larger than 53% and safer-reporting than 92% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105024.148.372.496.6Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 86Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 78Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 81Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 92Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 89Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 92Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 83Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 92Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 92
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 86
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 78
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 81
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 92
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 89
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 92
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 83
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 92
  • Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 92
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Bryant & Stratton College-Buffalo2,0860.00092
Berkeley College-New York2,1560.00392
SUNY Morrisville2,1867.32611
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University2,2203.15839
United Talmudical Seminary2,2410.001192
Nazareth University2,4017.50148
Canisius University2,4511.631764
Vassar College2,46210.15190
Mount Saint Mary College2,4911.202278
Manhattanville University2,5121.592567
Daemen University2,5403.542828
Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel (this campus)2,9570.005392

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Mount Aloysius College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

18 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
18 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
2,957
Data year
2024

PA

Mount Aloysius College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
2,955
Data year
2024

IL

Prairie State College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
2,953
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel sits on price and outcomes

See New York's cost ranking

At $4,156, Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel's reported average net price is among the lowest reported prices among 326 New York colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,940.

$4,156
average net price
$17,940
New York median
$567
reported income-bracket spread

Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $3,915 and those above $110,000 report $4,482, a difference of just $567. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.

Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $27,871 - about 6.7 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$16,000
Out-of-State Tuition
$16,000
Avg Net Price
$4,156
Pell Grant Recipients
87%
How does this cost rank in NY? →

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
74%
Retention Rate
94%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$27,871
Median Earnings (10yr)
$31,853

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,243 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel, both outside NY so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel safe?
Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Bard College (7.56/1k); SUNY College of Technology at Delhi (3.60/1k); SUNY College at Potsdam (2.12/1k); Le Moyne College (2.91/1k); Russell Sage College (3.23/1k); Culinary Institute of America (5.72/1k); SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (1.45/1k); St Bonaventure University (2.91/1k).
What crimes are reported at Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel compare to similar schools?
Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Mount Aloysius College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Mount Aloysius College (0.00/1k); Prairie State College (0.00/1k); Milwaukee School of Engineering (6.43/1k); Galen College of Nursing-San Antonio (0.00/1k); Rappahannock Community College (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Bard College (7.56/1k); SUNY College of Technology at Delhi (3.60/1k); SUNY College at Potsdam (2.12/1k); Le Moyne College (2.91/1k); Russell Sage College (3.23/1k); Culinary Institute of America (5.72/1k); SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (1.45/1k); St Bonaventure University (2.91/1k).
Does Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel have fire safety data?
Yes. Uta Mesivta of Kiryas Joel reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.