Long Beach, CA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California

Across 2022–2024, Universal Technical Institute-Southern California reported 8 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count rose over that span (largest filed category: Motor Vehicle Theft). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: American Career College-Anaheim.

2.35
Incidents / 1k students
#1,133
Rank of 2,072
#241
CA rank
1,701
Enrolled students

2.35 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California reports 2.35 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 - 70% below Bryan College-Dayton. Similar-enrollment scored peers: Bryan College-Dayton (1.76/1k); Pomona College (34.71/1k); Montana Technological University (1.18/1k); Navajo Technical University (1.17/1k); Chattahoochee Valley Community College (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set also includes American Career College-Anaheim (2.43/1k); College of the Siskiyous (1.90/1k); Universal Technical Institute of California Inc (1.93/1k); MTI College (0.00/1k); Copper Mountain Community College (0.00/1k); Institute of Technology (1.45/1k); Lassen Community College (0.49/1k); UEI College-Gardena (0.00/1k). Largest Criminal Offenses total across filed years: Motor Vehicle Theft.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
2.35
of 2,072 ranked nationally
#1,133
report fewer incidents than this campus
55%
Criminal Offenses, 2024
4
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 487597 · Universal Technical Institute-Southern California 2.35/1k score rate · #1,133/2,072

RATE-MID · RANK-LOWER · ST-MID · ABOVE-PEER · ZERO-NONE · TREND-UP · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-MID 2.35/1k
  • RANK-LOWER #1,133/2,072
  • ST-MID #241 in state
  • ABOVE-PEER Bryan College-Dayton · +0.59
  • ZERO-NONE Scored
  • TREND-UP ↑ 300%
  • CAT-LEAD Motor Vehicle Th…
  • ENR-SMALL 1,701
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Bryan College-Dayton (-0.59/1k)

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California sheet RATE-MID · RANK-LOWER · ST-MID · ABOVE-PEER · ZERO-NONE · TREND-UP · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Bryan College-Dayton. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-MID · RANK-LOWER · ST-MID · ABOVE-PEER · ZERO-NONE · TREND-UP · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Bryan College-Dayton (-0.59/1k). National rank #1,133 of 2,072 scored campuses. Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California reports 2.35 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 - 70% below Bryan College-Dayton. Similar-enrollment scored peers: Bryan College-Dayton (1.76/1k); Pomona College (34.71/1k); Montana Technological University (1.18/1k); Navajo Technical University (1.17/1k); Chattahoochee Valley Community College (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set also includes American Career College-Anaheim (2.43/1k); College of the Siskiyous (1.90/1k); Universal Technical Institute of California Inc (1.93/1k); MTI College (0.00/1k); Copper Mountain Community College (0.00/1k); Institute of Technology (1.45/1k); Lassen Community College (0.49/1k); UEI College-Gardena (0.00/1k). Largest Criminal Offenses total across filed years: Motor Vehicle Theft.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Universal Technical Institute-Southern

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Universal on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Universal Technical Institute-Southern California's 2.35/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

+1 reported incidents

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California increased from 3 to 4 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CA 2-year peers in this comparison, Universal Technical Institute-Southern California is larger than 81% and safer-reporting than 8% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Universal Technical Instit…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Universal Technical Instit…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
San Joaquin Valley College-Fresno4470.00033
Glendale Career College-North-West College-Bakersfield4930.00333
North-West College-Anaheim5130.00633
National Polytechnic College5161.94811
San Joaquin Valley College-Hesperia5280.001133
Pima Medical Institute-Chula Vista5370.001433
Institute of Culinary Education5530.001733
Contra Costa Medical Career College5560.001933
Pima Medical Institute-San Marcos5730.002233
San Joaquin Valley College-Modesto5980.002533
Career Care Institute6200.002833
Universal Technical Institute-Southern California (this campus)1,7012.35818

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What changed between 2023 and 2024

Reported on-campus incidents at Universal Technical Institute-Southern California rose from 3 to 4 (+33%). The increase shows up in Motor Vehicle Theft (1 to 4). Falling over the same period: Burglary (2 to 0).

This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.

What actually gets reported at Universal Technical Institute-Southern California

Across 3 reporting years, on-campus incidents were recorded in 2 Clery Act categories here: Motor Vehicle Theft and Burglary. Motor Vehicle Theft accounts for most of them.

The remaining 9 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Fondling and Incest. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California: Criminal Offenses by year

Rising 300% (1 → 4 incidents)

012345 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 1On-campus incidents, 2023: 3On-campus incidents, 2024: 4 1 4 ▲ +300.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 1
2023 3
2024 4
Crime Type 202420232022
Motor Vehicle Theft 410
Burglary 021
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CA

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California

2.35 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#1,133
Enrollment
1,701
Data year
2024

TN

Bryan College-Dayton

1.76 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#956
Enrollment
1,701
Data year
2024

CA

Pomona College

34.71 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#2,062
Enrollment
1,700
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Universal Technical Institute-Southern California sits on price and outcomes

See California's cost ranking

At $27,506, Universal Technical Institute-Southern California's reported average net price is cheaper than 70% among 492 California colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $20,161.

$27,506
average net price
$20,161
California median
3.6×
six-year earnings to median debt
$6,160
reported income-bracket spread

Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $26,301 and those above $110,000 report $32,461, a difference of just $6,160. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.

Six-year median earnings of $47,320 run about 1.7 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. 58% complete within six years, so roughly 42% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$47,320
Median Earnings (10yr)
$52,873
Loan Repayment (3yr)
57%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,319 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Closest by National Rank

Universal Technical Institute-Southern California (national rank #1133) sits near Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science (#1132) and Wright State University-Main Campus (#1134) on the scored national list, nearest by rank, not by size or state.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Universal Technical Institute-Southern California, both outside CA so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Similar 2024 Clery rate (nationwide)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Universal Technical Institute-Southern California safe?
Universal Technical Institute-Southern California has a safety score of 2.35 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students) and ranks #1,133 nationally out of 2,072 ranked institutions - nearest similar-enrollment comparison: Bryan College-Dayton (1.76/1k). Same-state same-level set: American Career College-Anaheim (2.43/1k); College of the Siskiyous (1.90/1k); Universal Technical Institute of California Inc (1.93/1k); MTI College (0.00/1k); Copper Mountain Community College (0.00/1k); Institute of Technology (1.45/1k); Lassen Community College (0.49/1k); UEI College-Gardena (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Universal Technical Institute-Southern California?
For calendar year 2024, Universal Technical Institute-Southern California reported Motor Vehicle Theft (4) in the Criminal Offenses section. Every other category in that section was reported at zero; other Clery tables are separate.
How does Universal Technical Institute-Southern California compare to similar schools?
Universal Technical Institute-Southern California reports 70% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Bryan College-Dayton. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Bryan College-Dayton (1.76/1k); Pomona College (34.71/1k); Montana Technological University (1.18/1k); Navajo Technical University (1.17/1k); Chattahoochee Valley Community College (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: American Career College-Anaheim (2.43/1k); College of the Siskiyous (1.90/1k); Universal Technical Institute of California Inc (1.93/1k); MTI College (0.00/1k); Copper Mountain Community College (0.00/1k); Institute of Technology (1.45/1k); Lassen Community College (0.49/1k); UEI College-Gardena (0.00/1k).
Does Universal Technical Institute-Southern California have fire safety data?
Universal Technical Institute-Southern California has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.