TX
The Recording Conservatory of Austin
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Austin, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit
The Recording Conservatory of Austin
The Recording Conservatory of Austin reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- 77
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
The Recording Conservatory of Austin reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 485953 · The Recording Conservatory of 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UNK State rank n/a
- PEER-FINISH Hilltop Beauty School · ±0.00
- ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-NONE No incidents
- ENR-SMALL 77
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Hilltop Beauty School (+0.00/1k)
The Recording Conservatory of Austin sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Hilltop Beauty School. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Hilltop Beauty School (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
The Recording Conservatory of Austin reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around The Recording Conservatory
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest The on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- The Recording Conservatory of · this campus · lowest 0
The Recording Conservatory of Austin — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Empire Beauty School-Richmond · highest peer 0
Empire Beauty School-Richmond — highest peer
0 per 1,000 students
- Hilltop Beauty School · near 0
Hilltop Beauty School — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Aveda Institute-Maryland · near 0
Aveda Institute-Maryland — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Nuvani Institute · near 0
Nuvani Institute — near
0 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around The Recording Conservatory of Austin's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
The Recording Conservatory of Austin was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 37 TX 2-year peers in this comparison, The Recording Conservatory of Austin is larger than 14% and safer-reporting than 19% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
- Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
- Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
- Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- The Recording Conservatory…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest College for the Deaf | 47 | 0.00 | 0 | 19 |
| Interactive College of Technology | 55 | 0.00 | 3 | 19 |
| Peloton College | 61 | 0.00 | 6 | 19 |
| Interactive College of Technology | 65 | 0.00 | 8 | 19 |
| KD Conservatory College of Film and Dramatic Arts | 70 | 0.00 | 11 | 19 |
| The Recording Conservatory of Austin (this campus) | 77 | 0.00 | 14 | 19 |
| Interactive College of Technology | 86 | 0.00 | 17 | 19 |
| School of Automotive Machinists & Technology | 88 | 0.00 | 19 | 19 |
| Remington College-Houston Southeast Campus | 111 | 0.00 | 22 | 19 |
| Texas Healthtech Institute | 150 | 0.00 | 25 | 19 |
| Remington College-Fort Worth Campus | 154 | 0.00 | 28 | 19 |
| Southern Careers Institute-Waco | 185 | 0.00 | 31 | 19 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
Crime Statistics by Year
The Criminal Offenses section for The Recording Conservatory of Austin is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Hilltop Beauty School.
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
9 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
The Recording Conservatory of Austin vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
CA
Hilltop Beauty School
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
MD
Aveda Institute-Maryland
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Cost context
Where The Recording Conservatory of Austin sits on price and outcomes
At $29,859, The Recording Conservatory of Austin's reported average net price is cheaper than 93% among 337 Texas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,267.
- $29,859
- average net price
- $18,267
- Texas median
- $5,449
- reported income-bracket spread
Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $26,058 and those above $110,000 report $31,507, a difference of just $5,449. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.
61% complete within six years, so roughly 39% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. A completion rate describes the cohort, not an individual student's likelihood of finishing.
Academic & Financial Profile
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,140 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Hilltop Beauty School
Daly City, CA · 77 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Aveda Institute-Maryland
Bel Air, MD · 77 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Nuvani Institute
Eagle Pass, TX · 77 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Louisiana Culinary Institute
Baton Rouge, LA · 77 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Empire Beauty School-Richmond
Richmond, VA · 77 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Recording Conservatory of Austin safe?
The Recording Conservatory of Austin has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 77 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Hilltop Beauty School. Same-state same-level set: KD Conservatory College of Film and Dramatic Arts (0.00/1k); Interactive College of Technology (0.00/1k); School of Automotive Machinists & Technology (0.00/1k); Interactive College of Technology (0.00/1k); Peloton College (0.00/1k); Interactive College of Technology (0.00/1k); Southwest College for the Deaf (0.00/1k); Remington College-Houston Southeast Campus (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at The Recording Conservatory of Austin?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. The Recording Conservatory of Austin reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does The Recording Conservatory of Austin compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Hilltop Beauty School at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in TX; same-state same-level scored peers include KD Conservatory College of Film and Dramatic Arts (0.00/1k); Interactive College of Technology (0.00/1k); School of Automotive Machinists & Technology (0.00/1k); Interactive College of Technology (0.00/1k); Peloton College (0.00/1k); Interactive College of Technology (0.00/1k); Southwest College for the Deaf (0.00/1k); Remington College-Houston Southeast Campus (0.00/1k).
Does The Recording Conservatory of Austin have fire safety data?
The Recording Conservatory of Austin has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.