Pasadena, TX · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc

Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
261
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 228866 · Texas Chiropractic College Foundation 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Thomas Jefferson School of · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 261
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Thomas Jefferson School of Law (+0.00/1k)

Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Thomas Jefferson School of Law. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Thomas Jefferson School of Law (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Texas Chiropractic College

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Texas on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 TX 4-year peers in this comparison, Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc is larger than 56% and safer-reporting than 33% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Texas Chiropractic College…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Texas Chiropractic College…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
DeVry University-Texas170.00033
Redeemers University North America230.00333
Messenger College240.00633
Christ Mission College320.00833
Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary7513.331111
American College of Acupuncture and Oriental Med760.001433
Texas Health and Science University920.001733
Baptist University of the Americas1049.621914
Episcopal Theological Seminary of the Southwest1099.172217
Southwestern Christian College1100.002533
American InterContinental University-Houston1160.002833
Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc (this campus)2610.005633

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Los Angeles College of Music.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

TX

Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
261
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,209 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc safe?
Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 261 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Los Angeles College of Music. Same-state same-level set: Wade College (0.00/1k); Remington College-Dallas Campus (0.00/1k); Dallas Christian College (4.03/1k); South University-Austin (0.00/1k); Arlington Baptist University (0.00/1k); The Chicago School at Dallas (0.00/1k); Oblate School of Theology (5.78/1k); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (164.35/1k).
What crimes are reported at Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc compare to similar schools?
Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Los Angeles College of Music. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Los Angeles College of Music (3.83/1k); Thomas Jefferson School of Law (0.00/1k); Southeastern Technical Institute (0.00/1k); Little Big Horn College (0.00/1k); South Hills School of Business & Technology (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Wade College (0.00/1k); Remington College-Dallas Campus (0.00/1k); Dallas Christian College (4.03/1k); South University-Austin (0.00/1k); Arlington Baptist University (0.00/1k); The Chicago School at Dallas (0.00/1k); Oblate School of Theology (5.78/1k); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (164.35/1k).
Does Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc have fire safety data?
Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.