Livingston, TN · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#11
TN rank
1,055
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 220640 · Tennessee College of Applied 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #11 in state
  • PEER-FINISH St Paul's School of · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 1,055
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: St Paul's School of Nursing-Queens (+0.00/1k)

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer St Paul's School of Nursing-Queens. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is St Paul's School of Nursing-Queens (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Tennessee College of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Tennessee on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 TN 2-year peers in this comparison, Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston is larger than 67% and safer-reporting than 19% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Tennessee College of Appli…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Tennessee College of Appli…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Nashville Film Institute600.00019
North Central Institute610.00319
John A Gupton College1660.00619
Chattanooga College Medical Dental and & Technical Careers2520.00819
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Henry/Carroll2780.001119
Remington College-Nashville Campus2800.001419
Remington College-Memphis Campus3310.001719
Fortis Institute-Cookeville3340.001919
TCAT Athens3660.002219
Fortis Institute-Nashville3930.002519
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Jacksboro4550.002819
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston (this campus)1,0550.006719

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: West Virginia Wesleyan College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 1
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

TN

Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
1,055
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston sits on price and outcomes

See Tennessee's cost ranking

At $12,612, Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston's reported average net price is cheaper than 38% among 124 Tennessee colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $15,269.

$12,612
average net price
$15,269
Tennessee median

Median reported earnings six years after entry are $31,579, roughly 2.5 times a year of net price. That is a workable ratio, though it says nothing about how long the programme takes to finish. 76% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$31,579
Median Earnings (10yr)
$33,497

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,249 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston, both outside TN so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston safe?
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Hartsville (0.00/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology Nashville (0.00/1k); Lincoln College of Technology-Nashville (3.10/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Murfreesboro (0.00/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-McMinnville (0.00/1k); Meridian Institute of Surgical Assisting (0.00/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Upper Cumberland (1.30/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston compare to similar schools?
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than West Virginia Wesleyan College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: West Virginia Wesleyan College (13.27/1k); St Paul's School of Nursing-Queens (0.00/1k); Saybrook University (0.00/1k); Northwest University (1.90/1k); Lincoln College of Technology-Indianapolis (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Hartsville (0.00/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology Nashville (0.00/1k); Lincoln College of Technology-Nashville (3.10/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Murfreesboro (0.00/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-McMinnville (0.00/1k); Meridian Institute of Surgical Assisting (0.00/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Upper Cumberland (1.30/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Morristown (0.00/1k).
Does Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston have fire safety data?
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Livingston has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.