High Point, NC · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

South University-High Point

South University-High Point reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
67
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

South University-High Point reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 481720 · South University-High Point 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Pro Way Hair School · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 67
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Pro Way Hair School (+0.00/1k)

South University-High Point sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Pro Way Hair School. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Pro Way Hair School (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

South University-High Point reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around South University-High Point

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest South on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around South University-High Point's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

South University-High Point was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NC 4-year peers in this comparison, South University-High Point is larger than 6% and safer-reporting than 47% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19South University-High Point: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • South University-High Point: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Charlotte Christian College and Theological Seminary580.00047
Southeastern Free Will Baptist Bible College640.00347
South University-High Point (this campus)670.00647
Jung Tao School of Classical Chinese Medicine690.00847
Carolina Christian College710.001147
Daoist Traditions College of Chinese Medical Arts1020.001447
Hood Theological Seminary1150.001747
Watts College of Nursing1240.001947
Mid-Atlantic Christian University1400.002247
Saint Augustine's University1750.002547
Bennett College18011.112811
Shepherds Theological Seminary2010.003147

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), South University-High Point has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Pro Way Hair School.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

South University-High Point vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NC

South University-High Point

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
67
Data year
2024

GA

Pro Way Hair School

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
67
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$18,145
Out-of-State Tuition
$18,145
Median Debt
$26,123
Pell Grant Recipients
46%

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
11%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$34,115
Median Earnings (10yr)
$34,421
Loan Repayment (3yr)
45%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,082 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is South University-High Point safe?
South University-High Point has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 67 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Pro Way Hair School. Same-state same-level set: Jung Tao School of Classical Chinese Medicine (0.00/1k); Southeastern Free Will Baptist Bible College (0.00/1k); Carolina Christian College (0.00/1k); Charlotte Christian College and Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Daoist Traditions College of Chinese Medical Arts (0.00/1k); Hood Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Watts College of Nursing (0.00/1k); Mid-Atlantic Christian University (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at South University-High Point?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. South University-High Point reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does South University-High Point compare to similar schools?
South University-High Point reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Pro Way Hair School. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Pro Way Hair School (0.00/1k); Iowa School of Beauty-Sioux City (0.00/1k); Neighborhood Playhouse School of the Theater (0.00/1k); Adult and Community Education-Hudson (14.93/1k); MCVSD (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Jung Tao School of Classical Chinese Medicine (0.00/1k); Southeastern Free Will Baptist Bible College (0.00/1k); Carolina Christian College (0.00/1k); Charlotte Christian College and Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Daoist Traditions College of Chinese Medical Arts (0.00/1k); Hood Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Watts College of Nursing (0.00/1k); Mid-Atlantic Christian University (0.00/1k).
Does South University-High Point have fire safety data?
South University-High Point has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.