Mt. Pleasant, MI · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Protege Academy

Protege Academy reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
44
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Protege Academy reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 487083 · Protege Academy 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Taylor Institute of Cosmetology · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 44
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II (+0.00/1k)

Protege Academy sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Protege Academy reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Protege Academy

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Protege on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Protege Academy's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Protege Academy was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MI Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Protege Academy is larger than 33% and safer-reporting than 0% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Protege Academy: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Protege Academy: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Lakewood School of Therapeutic Massage100.0000
Sharp's Academy of Hairstyling160.0030
Hillsdale Beauty College260.0060
Great Lakes Boat Building School260.0060
Dymond Designs Beauty School280.00110
Ross Medical Education Center-New Baltimore330.00140
Port Huron Cosmetology College370.00170
Creative Hair School of Cosmetology380.00190
Ross Medical Education Center-Port Huron380.00190
Ross Medical Education Center-Brighton390.00250
Cadillac Institute of Cosmetology430.00280
Protege Academy (this campus)440.00330

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Protege Academy recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Protege Academy vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MI

Protege Academy

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
44
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Protege Academy sits on price and outcomes

See Michigan's cost ranking

At $11,619, Protege Academy's reported average net price is cheaper than 27% among 138 Michigan colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,263.

$11,619
average net price
$17,263
Michigan median
2.2×
six-year earnings to median debt

Six-year median earnings of $21,793 run about 1.9 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. 58% complete within six years, so roughly 42% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$21,793
Median Earnings (10yr)
$19,499

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 799 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Protege Academy safe?
Protege Academy has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 44 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II. Same-state same-level set: Cadillac Institute of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Marketti Academy of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Brighton Institute of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Ross Medical Education Center-Brighton (0.00/1k); The Salon Professional Academy-Battle Creek (0.00/1k); Creative Hair School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); M J Murphy Beauty College of Mount Pleasant (0.00/1k); Ross Medical Education Center-Port Huron (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Protege Academy?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Protege Academy reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Protege Academy compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Taylor Institute of Cosmetology II at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in MI; same-state same-level scored peers include Cadillac Institute of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Marketti Academy of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Brighton Institute of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Ross Medical Education Center-Brighton (0.00/1k); The Salon Professional Academy-Battle Creek (0.00/1k); Creative Hair School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); M J Murphy Beauty College of Mount Pleasant (0.00/1k); Ross Medical Education Center-Port Huron (0.00/1k).
Does Protege Academy have fire safety data?
Protege Academy has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.