Costa Mesa, CA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa

Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
395
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 442240 · Paul Mitchell the School-Costa 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Donnelly College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 395
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Donnelly College (+0.00/1k)

Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Donnelly College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Donnelly College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Paul Mitchell the

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Paul on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CA Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa is larger than 83% and safer-reporting than 14% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Paul Mitchell the School-C…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Paul Mitchell the School-C…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Federico Beauty Institute2204.5508
Sierra College of Beauty2200.00014
Healing Hands School of Holistic Health2200.00014
Salon Success Academy-Redlands2200.00014
CET-San Diego2230.001114
Paul Mitchell the School-Fresno2230.001114
Urban Barber College2240.001714
Paul Mitchell the School-San Diego2250.001914
California College of Barbering and Cosmetology2270.002214
Lu Ross Academy2290.002514
Clovis Adult Education2380.002814
Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa (this campus)3950.008314

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Donnelly College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CA

Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
395
Data year
2024

KS

Donnelly College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
395
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa sits on price and outcomes

See California's cost ranking

At $21,920, Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa's reported average net price is cheaper than 55% among 492 California colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $20,161.

$21,920
average net price
$20,161
California median
1.8×
six-year earnings to median debt
$4,691
reported income-bracket spread

Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $20,550 and those above $110,000 report $25,241, a difference of just $4,691. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.

Median earnings six years after entry ($23,724) are less than 1.1 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 84% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$23,724
Median Earnings (10yr)
$26,897
Loan Repayment (3yr)
48%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,151 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa safe?
Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 395 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Donnelly College. Same-state same-level set: North-West College-Pomona (0.00/1k); Moler Barber College (0.00/1k); Baldwin Park Adult & Community Education (0.00/1k); Milan Institute-Merced (0.00/1k); Milan Institute-Palm Desert (0.00/1k); Asian-American International Beauty College (0.00/1k); Advance Beauty College (0.00/1k); American Beauty College (8.98/1k).
What crimes are reported at Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Donnelly College at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in CA; same-state same-level scored peers include North-West College-Pomona (0.00/1k); Moler Barber College (0.00/1k); Baldwin Park Adult & Community Education (0.00/1k); Milan Institute-Merced (0.00/1k); Milan Institute-Palm Desert (0.00/1k); Asian-American International Beauty College (0.00/1k); Advance Beauty College (0.00/1k); American Beauty College (8.98/1k).
Does Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa have fire safety data?
Paul Mitchell the School-Costa Mesa has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.