San Marcos, CA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Palomar Institute of Cosmetology

Palomar Institute of Cosmetology reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
193
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Palomar Institute of Cosmetology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 365125 · Palomar Institute of Cosmetology 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Blessing Rieman College of · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 193
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences (+0.00/1k)

Palomar Institute of Cosmetology sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Palomar Institute of Cosmetology reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Palomar Institute of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Palomar on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Palomar Institute of Cosmetology's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Palomar Institute of Cosmetology was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CA Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Palomar Institute of Cosmetology is larger than 47% and safer-reporting than 6% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Palomar Institute of Cosme…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Palomar Institute of Cosme…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Lancaster Beauty School1500.0006
Marian Health Careers Center-Los Angeles Campus1500.0006
CET-Soledad1550.0066
Southern California Health Institute1560.0086
The Fab School1610.00116
CET-Colton1620.00146
Salon Success Academy-Riverside1640.00176
San Francisco Institute of Esthetics & Cosmetology Inc1670.00196
Paul Mitchell the School-Pasadena1700.00226
CET-Salinas1710.00256
Mt. Diablo Adult Education-Mt. Diablo USD1720.00286
Palomar Institute of Cosmetology (this campus)1930.00476

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Palomar Institute of Cosmetology has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Palomar Institute of Cosmetology vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CA

Palomar Institute of Cosmetology

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
193
Data year
2024

LA

LaSalle Tech

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
193
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Palomar Institute of Cosmetology sits on price and outcomes

See California's cost ranking

At $27,778, Palomar Institute of Cosmetology's reported average net price is cheaper than 71% among 492 California colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $20,161.

$27,778
average net price
$20,161
California median
3.3×
six-year earnings to median debt
$6,766
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $25,526 for families reporting under $30,000 against $32,292 above $110,000, a difference of $6,766. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $27,778 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

Median earnings six years after entry ($20,718) are less than one year of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 89% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$20,718
Median Earnings (10yr)
$23,451

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,290 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Palomar Institute of Cosmetology safe?
Palomar Institute of Cosmetology has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 193 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences. Same-state same-level set: Unitek College (0.00/1k); Salon Success Academy-Corona (0.00/1k); The Salon Professional Academy-San Jose (0.00/1k); Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-East Bay (0.00/1k); Coastline Beauty College (4.93/1k); InterCoast Colleges-Fairfield (0.00/1k); North Adrian's College of Beauty Inc (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Palomar Institute of Cosmetology?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Palomar Institute of Cosmetology reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Palomar Institute of Cosmetology compare to similar schools?
Palomar Institute of Cosmetology reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Blessing Rieman College of Nursing and Health Sciences (0.00/1k); LaSalle Tech (0.00/1k); Veeb Nassau County School of Practical Nursing (0.00/1k); Washington County Career Center-Adult Technical Training (5.18/1k); MyrAngel Beauty Institute (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Unitek College (0.00/1k); Salon Success Academy-Corona (0.00/1k); The Salon Professional Academy-San Jose (0.00/1k); Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-East Bay (0.00/1k); Coastline Beauty College (4.93/1k); InterCoast Colleges-Fairfield (0.00/1k); North Adrian's College of Beauty Inc (0.00/1k).
Does Palomar Institute of Cosmetology have fire safety data?
Palomar Institute of Cosmetology has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.