Neosho, MO · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Neosho Beauty College

Neosho Beauty College reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
47
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Neosho Beauty College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 178527 · Neosho Beauty College 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Assabet Valley Regional Technical · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 47
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Assabet Valley Regional Technical School (+0.00/1k)

Neosho Beauty College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Assabet Valley Regional Technical School. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Assabet Valley Regional Technical School (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Neosho Beauty College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Neosho Beauty College

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Neosho on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Neosho Beauty College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Neosho Beauty College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MO Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Neosho Beauty College is larger than 47% and safer-reporting than 8% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Neosho Beauty College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Neosho Beauty College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
St. Louis Med Tech120.0008
Evolve Beauty Academy160.0038
Kirksville Area Technical Center220.0068
Saline County Career Center230.0088
Lex La-Ray Technical Center250.00118
Carthage R9 School District-Carthage Technical Center260.00148
Concorde Career College-Broadway260.00148
Waynesville Career Center270.00198
Cass Career Center270.00198
Aesthetics Institute280.00258
Four Rivers Career Center300.00288
Neosho Beauty College (this campus)470.00478

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Neosho Beauty College is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Assabet Valley Regional Technical School.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Neosho Beauty College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MO

Neosho Beauty College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
47
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Neosho Beauty College sits on price and outcomes

See Missouri's cost ranking

At $12,213, Neosho Beauty College's reported average net price is cheaper than 19% among 116 Missouri colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,613.

$12,213
average net price
$17,613
Missouri median
3.0×
six-year earnings to median debt

Six-year median earnings of $28,896 run about 2.4 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. 61% complete within six years, so roughly 39% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$28,896
Median Earnings (10yr)
$18,280

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 853 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Neosho Beauty College safe?
Neosho Beauty College has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 47 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Assabet Valley Regional Technical School. Same-state same-level set: Academy of Salon Professionals (0.00/1k); House of Heavilin Beauty College-Kansas City (0.00/1k); New Dimensions School of Hair Design (0.00/1k); Central College of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Pike-Lincoln Technical Center (0.00/1k); Salem College of Hairstyling (32.26/1k); Warrensburg Area Career Center (0.00/1k); Academy of Beauty Professionals (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Neosho Beauty College?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Neosho Beauty College reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Neosho Beauty College compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Assabet Valley Regional Technical School at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in MO; same-state same-level scored peers include Academy of Salon Professionals (0.00/1k); House of Heavilin Beauty College-Kansas City (0.00/1k); New Dimensions School of Hair Design (0.00/1k); Central College of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Pike-Lincoln Technical Center (0.00/1k); Salem College of Hairstyling (32.26/1k); Warrensburg Area Career Center (0.00/1k); Academy of Beauty Professionals (0.00/1k).
Does Neosho Beauty College have fire safety data?
Neosho Beauty College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.