Troy, MI · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Michigan College of Beauty-Troy

Across 2022–2024, Michigan College of Beauty-Troy reported 1 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, with no net change between the first and last filed year; largest filed category is Aggravated Assault.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
230
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Michigan College of Beauty-Troy reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 381370 · Michigan College of Beauty-Troy 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH RAND School of Public · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-LEAD Aggravated Assault
  • ENR-SMALL 230
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: RAND School of Public Policy (+0.00/1k)

Michigan College of Beauty-Troy sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer RAND School of Public Policy. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is RAND School of Public Policy (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Michigan College of Beauty-Troy reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Michigan College of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Michigan on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Michigan College of Beauty-Troy's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

-1 reported incidents

Michigan College of Beauty-Troy decreased from 1 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MI Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Michigan College of Beauty-Troy is larger than 86% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Michigan College of Beauty…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Michigan College of Beauty…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Ross Medical Education Center-Davison530.0003
Ross Medical Education Center-Midland570.0033
Michigan College of Beauty-Monroe700.0063
Protege Academy720.0083
Ross Medical Education Center-Taylor750.00113
Paul Mitchell the School-Great Lakes750.00113
The Salon Professional Academy of Holland820.00173
Dorsey College-Grand Rapids820.00173
Ross Medical Education Center-Saginaw840.00223
Paul Mitchell the School-Grand Rapids860.00253
P&A Scholars Beauty School900.00283
Michigan College of Beauty-Troy (this campus)2300.00863

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What changed between 2023 and 2024

Reported on-campus incidents at Michigan College of Beauty-Troy fell from 1 to 0 (-100%). The decrease shows up in Aggravated Assault (1 to 0).

This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.

What actually gets reported at Michigan College of Beauty-Troy

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Aggravated Assault.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Arson, Burglary, Fondling and Incest. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Michigan College of Beauty-Troy: Criminal Offenses by year

Stable

00.511.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 0On-campus incidents, 2023: 1On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 0 0 ▲ +0.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Aggravated Assault 010
Arson 000
Burglary 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Motor Vehicle Theft 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Michigan College of Beauty-Troy vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MI

Michigan College of Beauty-Troy

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
230
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Michigan College of Beauty-Troy sits on price and outcomes

See Michigan's cost ranking

At $18,013, Michigan College of Beauty-Troy's reported average net price is cheaper than 55% among 138 Michigan colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,263.

$18,013
average net price
$17,263
Michigan median
3.1×
six-year earnings to median debt

Median earnings six years after entry ($19,608) are less than 1.1 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 67% complete within six years, so roughly 33% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$19,608
Median Earnings (10yr)
$22,058
Loan Repayment (3yr)
42%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,238 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Michigan College of Beauty-Troy safe?
Michigan College of Beauty-Troy has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 230 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is RAND School of Public Policy. Same-state same-level set: David Pressley School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Ross Medical Education Center-Warren (0.00/1k); Dorsey College-Woodhaven (4.48/1k); Empire Beauty School-Michigan (0.00/1k); Elevate Salon Institute (0.00/1k); Dorsey College-Wayne (0.00/1k); L'esprit Academy (0.00/1k); Twin City Beauty College (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Michigan College of Beauty-Troy?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Michigan College of Beauty-Troy reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Michigan College of Beauty-Troy compare to similar schools?
Michigan College of Beauty-Troy reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than RAND School of Public Policy. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: RAND School of Public Policy (0.00/1k); Remington College-Lafayette Campus (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Macon (0.00/1k); Marian University-Ancilla (4.35/1k); Lu Ross Academy (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: David Pressley School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Ross Medical Education Center-Warren (0.00/1k); Dorsey College-Woodhaven (4.48/1k); Empire Beauty School-Michigan (0.00/1k); Elevate Salon Institute (0.00/1k); Dorsey College-Wayne (0.00/1k); L'esprit Academy (0.00/1k); Twin City Beauty College (0.00/1k).
Does Michigan College of Beauty-Troy have fire safety data?
Michigan College of Beauty-Troy has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.