OK
Metro Technology Centers
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Oklahoma City, OK · Clery Act 2024 · Public
Metro Technology Centers
Metro Technology Centers reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- #10
- OK rank
- 1,626
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
Metro Technology Centers reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 363165 · Metro Technology Centers 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UPPER #10 in state
- PEER-FINISH Morgan Community College · ±0.00
- ZERO-FILED Zero filed
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-NONE No incidents
- ENR-SMALL 1,626
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Morgan Community College (+0.00/1k)
Metro Technology Centers sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Morgan Community College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Morgan Community College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
Metro Technology Centers reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around Metro Technology Centers
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Metro on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- Metro Technology Centers · this campus · lowest 0
Metro Technology Centers — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Morgan Community College · near 0
Morgan Community College — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Tennessee College of Applied · near 0
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Dickson — near
0 per 1,000 students
- New Mexico Institute of · near 5.55
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology — near
5.55 per 1,000 students
- St. Mary's College of · highest peer
St. Mary's College of Maryland — highest peer
15.95 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Metro Technology Centers's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
Metro Technology Centers was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 28 OK 2-year peers in this comparison, Metro Technology Centers is larger than 59% and safer-reporting than 56% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 52, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 63, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 15
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 41
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 41, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 70, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 74, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 37, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 30
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 26
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 30, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 26, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 15, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 7
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 52
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 7, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 4, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 4
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 85, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 93, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 96, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 48
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 37
- Metro Technology Centers: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 59, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma Technical College | 128 | 7.81 | 0 | 4 |
| ATA College | 193 | 5.18 | 4 | 11 |
| College of the Muscogee Nation | 241 | 0.00 | 7 | 56 |
| Miller-Motte College-Tulsa | 389 | 0.00 | 11 | 56 |
| Clary Sage College | 415 | 7.23 | 15 | 7 |
| Central Oklahoma College | 477 | 0.00 | 19 | 56 |
| Community Care College | 493 | 0.00 | 22 | 56 |
| Autry Technology Center | 632 | 0.00 | 26 | 56 |
| Gordon Cooper Technology Center | 860 | 0.00 | 30 | 56 |
| Tulsa Welding School-Tulsa | 892 | 1.12 | 33 | 30 |
| Meridian Technology Center | 1,009 | 0.99 | 37 | 33 |
| Metro Technology Centers (this campus) | 1,626 | 0.00 | 59 | 56 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
Crime Statistics by Year
Metro Technology Centers recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Morgan Community College.
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
27 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 3 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 1 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 1 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
Metro Technology Centers vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
CO
Morgan Community College
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
TN
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Dickson
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Cost context
Where Metro Technology Centers sits on price and outcomes
At $4,561, Metro Technology Centers's reported average net price is cheaper than 8% among 84 Oklahoma colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $12,710.
- $4,561
- average net price
- $12,710
- Oklahoma median
- 3.7×
- six-year earnings to median debt
- $7,206
- reported income-bracket spread
Aid here is steeply income-scaled. Families reporting under $30,000 of income record a net price of $4,172, while those above $110,000 record $11,378 - roughly 2.7 times as much. A published average of $4,561 therefore describes very few families well; the bracket nearest your own income is the more useful figure.
Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $35,174 - about 7.7 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. Only 36% complete within six years. Most students here do not finish, which is the single most important number on this page for anyone weighing the cost.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.
Academic & Financial Profile
Outcomes
- Median Earnings (6yr)
- $35,174
- Median Earnings (10yr)
- $38,830
- Loan Repayment (3yr)
- 49%
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,308 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Morgan Community College
Fort Morgan, CO · 1,626 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Dickson
Dickson, TN · 1,628 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Swarthmore College
Swarthmore, PA · 1,623 enrolled
Safety Score 9.86
St. Mary's College of Maryland
St. Mary'S City, MD · 1,630 enrolled
Safety Score 15.95
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Socorro, NM · 1,622 enrolled
Safety Score 5.55
Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate
Two Clery-derived peer sets for Metro Technology Centers, both outside OK so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).
Similar enrollment (nationwide)
Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Dickson
Dickson, TN · 1,628 enrolled
Safety score 0.00
Coahoma Community College
Clarksdale, MS · 1,633 enrolled
Safety score 3.06
Columbia-Greene Community College
Hudson, NY · 1,616 enrolled
Safety score 0.00
Carteret Community College
Morehead City, NC · 1,614 enrolled
Safety score 1.24
North Central Michigan College
Petoskey, MI · 1,613 enrolled
Safety score 0.00
Universal Technical Institute-Dallas Fort Worth
Irving, TX · 1,610 enrolled
Safety score 1.86
American Career College-Anaheim
Anaheim, CA · 1,644 enrolled
Safety score 2.43
Carl Sandburg College
Galesburg, IL · 1,603 enrolled
Safety score 0.00
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Metro Technology Centers safe?
Metro Technology Centers has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Indian Capital Technology Center-Muskogee (0.00/1k); Seminole State College (0.67/1k); Moore Norman Technology Center (0.00/1k); Carl Albert State College (2.16/1k); Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College (4.59/1k); Eastern Oklahoma State College (0.78/1k); Western Oklahoma State College (0.00/1k); Redlands Community College (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Metro Technology Centers?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Metro Technology Centers reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Metro Technology Centers compare to similar schools?
Metro Technology Centers reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Morgan Community College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Morgan Community College (0.00/1k); Tennessee College of Applied Technology-Dickson (0.00/1k); Swarthmore College (9.86/1k); St. Mary's College of Maryland (15.95/1k); New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (5.55/1k). Same-state same-level set: Indian Capital Technology Center-Muskogee (0.00/1k); Seminole State College (0.67/1k); Moore Norman Technology Center (0.00/1k); Carl Albert State College (2.16/1k); Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College (4.59/1k); Eastern Oklahoma State College (0.78/1k); Western Oklahoma State College (0.00/1k); Redlands Community College (0.00/1k).
Does Metro Technology Centers have fire safety data?
Metro Technology Centers has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.